Interpreter Offsets (was RE: ARM Interpreter)

Gary Benson gbenson at redhat.com
Thu Aug 13 03:34:29 PDT 2009


Andrew Haley wrote:
> Gary Benson wrote:
> > Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > I don't quite get things, since it would be pretty trivial to do
> > > this unconditionally, but it doesn't matter much.  Please amend
> > > the interpreter patch and we can get it *in*.  :-)
> > 
> > If there's a better way to do it then lets wait and do it that
> > way.  I'm pretty happy for the initial patch to have hardcoded
> > constants, but I would like to see an actual patch so I can look
> > it over.
> 
> Sure, everything gets submitted as patches, and approved, before
> being committed.  I just can't see any advantage to Ed being in a
> position where nothing is committed until the whole job is finished.
> No-one else works that way.

Like I said, I'm happy for an initial patch with hardcoded constants.
ie, Ed, please make and mail a patch.

Cheers,
Gary

-- 
http://gbenson.net/



More information about the zero-dev mailing list