From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Fri Dec 2 04:37:18 2011 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:37:18 -0500 Subject: Welcome to the "zero-dev" mailing list [test] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ED8C67E.6040208@LGonQn.Org> Hi I subscribed to this list in July but am apparently not receiving the emails... Any help resolving would be appreciated... Chris On 15/07/11 10:03 AM, zero-dev-request at openjdk.java.net wrote: > Welcome to the zero-dev at openjdk.java.net mailing list! > > To post to this list, send your email to: > > zero-dev at openjdk.java.net > > From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Fri Dec 2 04:46:16 2011 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:46:16 -0500 Subject: Welcome to the "zero-dev" mailing list [test] In-Reply-To: <4ED8C67E.6040208@LGonQn.Org> References: <4ED8C67E.6040208@LGonQn.Org> Message-ID: <4ED8C898.60803@LGonQn.Org> Hi Never mind, its a filtering problem on my end... please ignore previous emails. Sigh, Chris On 02/12/11 07:37 AM, Chris Phillips wrote: > Hi > > I subscribed to this list in July but am apparently not receiving the > emails... > Any help resolving would be appreciated... > > Chris > > On 15/07/11 10:03 AM, zero-dev-request at openjdk.java.net wrote: >> Welcome to the zero-dev at openjdk.java.net mailing list! >> >> To post to this list, send your email to: >> >> zero-dev at openjdk.java.net >> >> > > From edward.yu.wang at gmail.com Mon Dec 5 12:05:40 2011 From: edward.yu.wang at gmail.com (Edward Wang) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:05:40 +0800 Subject: Build shark against llvm 3.0 on mac os x Message-ID: Hi, I tried to build shark against 3.0 on mac os x. I started with repository http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/, applied shark llvm 3.0 patch mentioned here: http://labb.zafena.se/?p=459 and did bunch of other adjustments. I made some progress before hitting the wall. It began to complain something like "RicochetFrame is not a member of MethodHandles". Unlike other cpus' methodHandles implementation, hotspot/src/cpu/zero/vm/methodHandles_zero.hpp is just a placeholder, which says: #define TARGET_ARCH_NYI_6939861 1 So, my question is that did anyone try to build shark on os x before? Any suggestions? And in ZeroSharkFaq wiki, there's a line says "Zero is currently Linux- and GCC-specific". I begin to doubt whether my effort of building shark on os x will do any good to openjdk community :) Thanks, Edward From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Mon Dec 5 12:59:31 2011 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:59:31 -0500 Subject: Build shark against llvm 3.0 on mac os x [resend from correct acct] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EDD30B3.50709@LGonQn.Org> Hi Between jdk7 hsx21 and current hsx23 the support for the non-Richochet based JSR292 [invoke dynamic ] support that zero depended on was removed. I am in the process of re-working zero's jsr 292 support to function in hsx23 environment. Shark and especially LLVM 3.0 are more problematic, but after Zero is working again we will see. Chris On 05/12/11 03:05 PM, Edward Wang wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to build shark against 3.0 on mac os x. I started with > repository http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/, applied shark > llvm 3.0 patch mentioned here: http://labb.zafena.se/?p=459 and did > bunch of other adjustments. I made some progress before hitting the wall. > It began to complain something like "RicochetFrame is not a member of > MethodHandles". Unlike other cpus' methodHandles implementation, > hotspot/src/cpu/zero/vm/methodHandles_zero.hpp is just a placeholder, > which says: > #define TARGET_ARCH_NYI_6939861 1 > > So, my question is that did anyone try to build shark on os x before? Any > suggestions? > > And in ZeroSharkFaq wiki, there's a line says "Zero is currently > Linux- and GCC-specific". I begin to doubt whether my effort of > building shark on os x will do any good to openjdk community :) > > Thanks, > Edward > > From volker.simonis at gmail.com Tue Dec 6 00:32:31 2011 From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:32:31 +0100 Subject: Build shark against llvm 3.0 on mac os x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I don't think this error is OS X related. I suppose that nobody has implemented MethodHandles/JSR292 for the Zero-Port until now. 6939861 is the bug id for "6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations" http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6939861 which is apparently not yet implemented. Regards, Volker On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Edward Wang wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to build shark against 3.0 on mac os x. I started with > repository http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/, applied shark > llvm 3.0 patch mentioned here: http://labb.zafena.se/?p=459 and did > bunch of other adjustments. I made some progress before hitting the wall. > It began to complain something like "RicochetFrame is not a member of > MethodHandles". Unlike other cpus' methodHandles implementation, > hotspot/src/cpu/zero/vm/methodHandles_zero.hpp is just a placeholder, > which says: > ? #define TARGET_ARCH_NYI_6939861 1 > > So, my question is that did anyone try to build shark on os x before? Any > suggestions? > > And in ZeroSharkFaq wiki, there's a line says "Zero is currently > Linux- and GCC-specific". I begin to doubt whether my effort of > building shark on os x will do any good to openjdk community :) > > Thanks, > Edward From xerxes at zafena.se Fri Dec 9 07:38:40 2011 From: xerxes at zafena.se (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Xerxes_R=E5nby?=) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:38:40 +0100 Subject: ARM test results In-Reply-To: <4EE08F54.5070703@redhat.com> References: <4EE08F54.5070703@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4EE22B80.2080104@zafena.se> JTREG Errors usually indicate a timeout while running the test. 2011-12-08 11:20, Andrew Haley skrev: > Error: com/sun/jdi/EarlyReturnTest.java ... > Error: javax/sound/midi/Gervill/SoftSynthesizer/TestRender1.java Gervill are known to generate an "emergency soundbank" at startup, this do take time and hurts user experience. We should consider pre-generate the "emergency soundbank" it at compile time. ... > Error: sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.java > Error: sun/nio/cs/FindEncoderBugs.java > Error: sun/nio/cs/FindOneCharEncoderBugs.java These Find*Bugs tests are known to take hours to run on ARM. ... > Error: vm/verifier/VerifyStackForExceptionHandlers.java ... Ed Nevill who designed the ARM assembler interpreter and thumb2 jit found that most of these errors can be circumvented by passing -timeout:3 when running the jtreg zero architectures. Also passing -Xmx256M -vmoption:-Xmx256M cam help some of the armel jtreg testsuite runs. You can also argue that all these timed-out tests indicate opportunities to optimize the JVM/class librarys for speed, and they will pass on time when the code are cleaned up. Xerxes From ChrisPhillips at LGonQn.Org Fri Dec 2 04:42:18 2011 From: ChrisPhillips at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:42:18 -0000 Subject: Welcome to the "zero-dev" mailing list [test] In-Reply-To: <4ED8C67E.6040208@LGonQn.Org> References: <4ED8C67E.6040208@LGonQn.Org> Message-ID: <4ED8C7A8.20100@LGonQn.Org> Never mind, its a filtering problem on my end... Sigh, Chris On 02/12/11 07:37 AM, Chris Phillips wrote: > Hi > > I subscribed to this list in July but am apparently not receiving the > emails... > Any help resolving would be appreciated... > > Chris > > On 15/07/11 10:03 AM, zero-dev-request at openjdk.java.net wrote: >> Welcome to the zero-dev at openjdk.java.net mailing list! >> >> To post to this list, send your email to: >> >> zero-dev at openjdk.java.net >> >> > > -- -- -- Woda: "Java: write once, debug anywhere" Hong Zhang http://thehenrys.ca | Chris Phillips - Resident cat slave and dubious character | | mailto:NorthernL00n at LGonQn.Org (416)483-3768 | | http://LGonQn.Org/www/Chris.Phillips cell: (416)505-3610 | "EPIC stands for Expects Perfectly Intuitive Compilers" P. Bannon http://www.hazmatmodine.com NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. "blah blah blah - Ginger!" -- From edward.yu.wang at gmail.com Sun Dec 4 19:39:32 2011 From: edward.yu.wang at gmail.com (Edward Wang) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 03:39:32 -0000 Subject: Build shark against llvm 3.0 on mac os x Message-ID: Hi, I tried to build shark against 3.0 on mac os x. I started with repository http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/, applied shark llvm 3.0 patch mentioned here: http://labb.zafena.se/?p=459 and did bunch of other adjustments. I made some progress before hit the wall. It began to complain something like "RicochetFrame is not a member of MethodHandles". Not like other cpus' methodHandles implementation, hotspot/src/cpu/zero/vm/methodHandles_zero.hpp is just a placeholder, which says: #define TARGET_ARCH_NYI_6939861 1 So, my question is does anyone try to build shark on os x before? Any suggestions? And in ZeroSharkFaq wiki, there's a line says "Zero is currently Linux- and GCC-specific". I begin to doubt whether my effort of building shark on os x will be any good to openjdk community :) Thanks, Edward