From aos.ppi.fudan at gmail.com Sat Dec 8 04:28:44 2012 From: aos.ppi.fudan at gmail.com (frank wong) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 20:28:44 +0800 Subject: Ask for tutorials about how to port OpenJDK to a new architecture/operating system Message-ID: I have a new kind of architecture with Solaris, I want to port OpenJdk to this platform. So I wonder if there is any tutorial to teach me how to port OpenJdk to a new platform. (Maybe can tell me which part of OpenJDK need to be modified?) Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/zero-dev/attachments/20121208/9ad6dcbc/attachment.html From rkennke at redhat.com Sat Dec 8 14:28:12 2012 From: rkennke at redhat.com (Roman Kennke) Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:28:12 +0100 Subject: Ask for tutorials about how to port OpenJDK to a new architecture/operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1355005692.1747.98.camel@mercury> Hi Frank, > I have a new kind of architecture with Solaris, I want to port OpenJdk > to this platform. So I wonder if there is any tutorial to teach me how > to port OpenJdk to a new platform. (Maybe can tell me which part of > OpenJDK need to be modified?) I am not sure what you mean by 'a new kind of architecture with Solaris', but I think a better mailing list to direct this question at is porters-dev at openjdk.java.net : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/porters-dev Zero itself is a variant of Hotspot that does not use any machine-code/assembly directly, therefore it could be useful in your porting effort to that new platform. Other than that, I think your question is too broad and the information you give too little to give a useful answer. Can you give us some more details about what it is that you're working on? Best regards, Roman From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Wed Dec 19 04:36:42 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:36:42 -0500 Subject: run -Xcomp -help error In-Reply-To: <65381218.d1cc.13bb2550462.Coremail.amiko212@126.com> References: <50D11601.9010108@RedHat.Com> <65381218.d1cc.13bb2550462.Coremail.amiko212@126.com> Message-ID: <50D1B4DA.90904@LGonQn.Org> Hi There are many problems with shark and llvm 3.1, particularly in the area of memory synchronization. Roman Kennke is porting shark into jdk8 and is using llvm 3.2 for that work. If you can upgrade maybe that will help, Chris On 19/12/12 03:43 AM, liu chao jun wrote: > HI all , > when i working on IcedTea 1-11-4 against shark .3.1 on the ,when run > -Xcomp -help the following error happened after finish its execution > ,And I found it seems there is samewhere which should used "JR"but > use"JARL" so the addrss jump to a wrong memory address , unluckly ,i > can find the address where it used ,of course maybe there is other > reasons that can lead to this error,Is anybody met this or similar > this ago , thank you very much ! > it seems a > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException: > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(ConcurrentHashMap.java:796) > at > sun.util.LocaleServiceProviderPool.getPool(LocaleServiceProviderPool.java:96) > at java.text.DecimalFormatS! > ymbols.getInstance(DecimalFormatSymbols.java:147) > at java.text.NumberFormat.getInstance(NumberFormat.java:767) > at java.text.NumberFormat.getInstance(NumberFormat.java:393) > at java.text.MessageFormat.subformat(MessageFormat.java:1254) > at java.text.MessageFormat.format(MessageFormat.java:853) > at java.text.Format.format(Format.java:157) > at java.text.MessageFormat.format(MessageFormat.java:829) > at sun.launcher.LauncherHelp.getLocalizedMessage(LauncherHelp.java:63) > at sun.launcher.LauncherHelp.initHelpMessage(LauncherHelp.java:75) > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/zero-dev/attachments/20121219/9bc6ca32/attachment.html From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Wed Dec 19 06:26:52 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:26:52 -0500 Subject: RFR: Fix zero fail to build in icedtea7-head... In-Reply-To: <2075166354.17785309.1355926575525.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> References: <2075166354.17785309.1355926575525.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: <50D1CEAC.3040603@LGonQn.Org> Hi Andrew On 19/12/12 09:16 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Attached patch is a backport of Roman's jdk8 fixes to Icedtea7-head. >> >> Please review. >> >> Cheers! >> Chris >> >> PS >> Webrev is here: >> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/it7-h-20121212_zero/ >> >> >> > Is this upstream? If so, what bug ID(s) does it include? I see none in the webrev. Sorry, Yes its a backport of Roman's fix for 8000780 : "make Zero build and run with JDK8" which was putback by twisti at the end of October. Its nearly identical except for the need to backout the Permgen Removal stuff. Cheers! Chris From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 06:16:15 2012 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:16:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: RFR: Fix zero fail to build in icedtea7-head... In-Reply-To: <50D11601.9010108@RedHat.Com> Message-ID: <2075166354.17785309.1355926575525.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> ----- Original Message ----- > Attached patch is a backport of Roman's jdk8 fixes to Icedtea7-head. > > Please review. > > Cheers! > Chris > > PS > Webrev is here: > http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/it7-h-20121212_zero/ > > > Is this upstream? If so, what bug ID(s) does it include? I see none in the webrev. -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 09:01:57 2012 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:01:57 -0500 (EST) Subject: RFR: Fix zero fail to build in icedtea7-head... In-Reply-To: <50D1CEAC.3040603@LGonQn.Org> Message-ID: <794628811.17881552.1355936517959.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Andrew > > > > > On 19/12/12 09:16 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Attached patch is a backport of Roman's jdk8 fixes to > >> Icedtea7-head. > >> > >> Please review. > >> > >> Cheers! > >> Chris > >> > >> PS > >> Webrev is here: > >> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/it7-h-20121212_zero/ > >> > >> > >> > > Is this upstream? If so, what bug ID(s) does it include? I see > > none in the webrev. > Sorry, > Yes its a backport of Roman's fix for 8000780 : "make Zero build and > run > with JDK8" > which was putback by twisti at the end of October. Its nearly > identical > except for > the need to backout the Permgen Removal stuff. > Ah, thanks! Do you know what the route is for getting it into 7u? Do we need to suggest it or will they just pull it in with a bulk HotSpot update? > Cheers! > Chris > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 From rkennke at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 09:11:17 2012 From: rkennke at redhat.com (Roman Kennke) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:11:17 +0100 Subject: RFR: Fix zero fail to build in icedtea7-head... In-Reply-To: <794628811.17881552.1355936517959.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> References: <794628811.17881552.1355936517959.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1355937077.1746.55.camel@mercury> Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2012, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Andrew Hughes: > ----- Original Message ----- > > Hi Andrew > > > > > > > > > > On 19/12/12 09:16 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> Attached patch is a backport of Roman's jdk8 fixes to > > >> Icedtea7-head. > > >> > > >> Please review. > > >> > > >> Cheers! > > >> Chris > > >> > > >> PS > > >> Webrev is here: > > >> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/it7-h-20121212_zero/ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Is this upstream? If so, what bug ID(s) does it include? I see > > > none in the webrev. > > Sorry, > > Yes its a backport of Roman's fix for 8000780 : "make Zero build and > > run > > with JDK8" > > which was putback by twisti at the end of October. Its nearly > > identical > > except for > > the need to backout the Permgen Removal stuff. > > > > Ah, thanks! Do you know what the route is for getting it into 7u? Do > we need to suggest it or will they just pull it in with a bulk HotSpot update? I would guess that we need to suggest it, and I also think that this is our plan. However, it sortof depends on another big change that needs to go into 7up first, Twisti already proposed it, but I think it got stuck. Roman From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Wed Dec 19 11:13:16 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:13:16 -0500 Subject: RFR: Fix zero fail to build in icedtea7-head... In-Reply-To: <1355937077.1746.55.camel@mercury> References: <794628811.17881552.1355936517959.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <1355937077.1746.55.camel@mercury> Message-ID: <50D211CC.5010303@LGonQn.Org> Hi I already have a patch that targets the current jdk7u-dev head. I'm still testing tho so didn't submit it there yet. Its slightly different than icedtea7 head. Chris Webrev is here: http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero-hs24b25++/ On 19/12/12 12:11 PM, Roman Kennke wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2012, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Andrew Hughes: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> Hi Andrew >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19/12/12 09:16 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> Attached patch is a backport of Roman's jdk8 fixes to >>>>> Icedtea7-head. >>>>> >>>>> Please review. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers! >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> PS >>>>> Webrev is here: >>>>> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/it7-h-20121212_zero/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Is this upstream? If so, what bug ID(s) does it include? I see >>>> none in the webrev. >>> Sorry, >>> Yes its a backport of Roman's fix for 8000780 : "make Zero build and >>> run >>> with JDK8" >>> which was putback by twisti at the end of October. Its nearly >>> identical >>> except for >>> the need to backout the Permgen Removal stuff. >>> >> Ah, thanks! Do you know what the route is for getting it into 7u? Do >> we need to suggest it or will they just pull it in with a bulk HotSpot update? > I would guess that we need to suggest it, and I also think that this is > our plan. However, it sortof depends on another big change that needs to > go into 7up first, Twisti already proposed it, but I think it got stuck. > > Roman > > From rkennke at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:41:48 2012 From: rkennke at redhat.com (Roman Kennke) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:41:48 +0100 Subject: RFR: Fix zero fail to build in icedtea7-head... In-Reply-To: <50D11601.9010108@RedHat.Com> References: <50D11601.9010108@RedHat.Com> Message-ID: <1355949708.1746.75.camel@mercury> Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2012, 20:18 -0500 schrieb Chris Phillips: > Attached patch is a backport of Roman's jdk8 fixes to Icedtea7-head. > > Please review. It looks good to me. Some little comments: --- old/make/Makefile 2012-12-13 09:16:51.027908161 -0500 +++ new/make/Makefile 2012-12-13 09:16:50.887903544 -0500 @@ -402,14 +402,30 @@ ifeq ($(JVM_VARIANT_ZEROSHARK), true) $(EXPORT_JRE_LIB_ARCH_DIR)/%.$(LIBRARY_SUFFIX): $(SHARK_DIR)/%.$(LIBRARY_SUFFIX) $(install-file) + $(EXPORT_JRE_LIB_ARCH_DIR)/%.debuginfo): Here's one one closing parenthesis too much ^ It means builds with expanded debuginfo will not work. This was my mistake, and it even slipped through to upstream jdk8. (A fix is on its way...) --- old/src/cpu/zero/vm/relocInfo_zero.cpp 2012-12-13 09:16:54.884035322 -0500 +++ new/src/cpu/zero/vm/relocInfo_zero.cpp 2012-12-13 09:16:54.775031727 -0500 @@ -77,3 +77,7 @@ CodeBuffer* dst) { ShouldNotCallThis(); } +// +//void metadata_Relocation::pd_fix_value(address x) { +// ShouldNotCallThis(); +//} There's no reason to add commented-out code. (Was that in my original patch? I hope not..) Other than that, it looks good to me! Cheers, Roman From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Thu Dec 20 04:17:21 2012 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:17:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: RFR: Fix zero fail to build in icedtea7-head... In-Reply-To: <50D211CC.5010303@LGonQn.Org> Message-ID: <1854722806.18308525.1356005841749.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> ----- Original Message ----- > Hi > > I already have a patch that targets the current jdk7u-dev > head. I'm still testing tho so didn't submit it there yet. > Its slightly different than icedtea7 head. > Will they be the same if we sync with upstream or is there some difference that's only present locally? I'd rather we just pull it in from 7u if possible, rather than having a local copy which then has to be merged with the upstream version. > Chris > Webrev is here: > http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero-hs24b25++/ > > On 19/12/12 12:11 PM, Roman Kennke wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2012, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Andrew Hughes: > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> Hi Andrew > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 19/12/12 09:16 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> Attached patch is a backport of Roman's jdk8 fixes to > >>>>> Icedtea7-head. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please review. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers! > >>>>> Chris > >>>>> > >>>>> PS > >>>>> Webrev is here: > >>>>> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/it7-h-20121212_zero/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Is this upstream? If so, what bug ID(s) does it include? I see > >>>> none in the webrev. > >>> Sorry, > >>> Yes its a backport of Roman's fix for 8000780 : "make Zero build > >>> and > >>> run > >>> with JDK8" > >>> which was putback by twisti at the end of October. Its nearly > >>> identical > >>> except for > >>> the need to backout the Permgen Removal stuff. > >>> > >> Ah, thanks! Do you know what the route is for getting it into 7u? > >> Do > >> we need to suggest it or will they just pull it in with a bulk > >> HotSpot update? > > I would guess that we need to suggest it, and I also think that > > this is > > our plan. However, it sortof depends on another big change that > > needs to > > go into 7up first, Twisti already proposed it, but I think it got > > stuck. > > > > Roman > > > > > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Thu Dec 20 15:09:37 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:09:37 -0500 Subject: RFR: 8000780 back ported Fix zero fail to build in JDK7u-dev Message-ID: <50D39AB1.90802@LGonQn.Org> Hi Attached is a backport (essentially resurrection of the Permgen code) of 8000780 Please review. Cheers! Chris PS Webrev is here: http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero-hs24b25++/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jdk7u-dev_hs24_Zero_8000780.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 47894 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/zero-dev/attachments/20121220/3f81f365/jdk7u-dev_hs24_Zero_8000780-0001.patch From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Fri Dec 21 15:34:18 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:34:18 -0500 Subject: RFR: 8000780 back ported Fix zero fail to build in JDK7u-dev [updated] Message-ID: <50D4F1FA.7090008@LGonQn.Org> Hi {Not sure if this needs a new bug or not, it definitely needs a sponsor - Twisti ? } Attached is a backport (essentially resurrection of the Permgen code) of 8000780 now updated with Roman Kennke's comments. Checked and built against hsx24b28. (Current jdk7u-dev hs) Please review. Cheers! Chris PS Webrev is here: http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero/hs24b28/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jdk7u-dev-8000780-backport.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 46512 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/zero-dev/attachments/20121221/7b3ca3e4/jdk7u-dev-8000780-backport-0001.patch From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Fri Dec 21 20:53:49 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 23:53:49 -0500 Subject: RFR: 8000780 back ported Fix zero fail to build in JDK7u-dev [updated] In-Reply-To: <50D5017B.20305@oracle.com> References: <50D4F1FA.7090008@LGonQn.Org> <50D5017B.20305@oracle.com> Message-ID: <50D53CDD.9090109@LGonQn.Org> Hi Alejandro, The only change since I tested this afternoon is the change for the hotspot_version. I will re-run tests if you wish but it seems unnecessary. Cheers! Chris On 21/12/12 07:40 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > > On 12/21/2012 4:34 PM, Chris Phillips @ T O wrote: >> Hi >> >> {Not sure if this needs a new bug or not, it definitely needs a sponsor >> - Twisti ? } >> >> Attached is a backport (essentially resurrection of the Permgen code) >> of 8000780 now updated with Roman Kennke's comments. Checked and built >> against hsx24b28. (Current jdk7u-dev hs) >> >> Please review. >> >> Cheers! >> Chris >> PS >> Webrev is here: >> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero/hs24b28/ > > Hi > jdk7u-dev/hotspot corresponds to hs24-b27. > I just got the hs24 snapshot for b28 and bumped the number to b29, > Can you rework the patch/webrev against this repo: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx24/hotspot > > once it's reviewed I can push it > > Thanks > From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Sat Dec 22 09:52:20 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:52:20 -0500 Subject: RFR: 8000780 back ported Fix zero fail to build in JDK7u-dev [updated] In-Reply-To: <50D5017B.20305@oracle.com> References: <50D4F1FA.7090008@LGonQn.Org> <50D5017B.20305@oracle.com> Message-ID: <50D5F354.8040900@LGonQn.Org> On 21/12/12 07:40 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > > On 12/21/2012 4:34 PM, Chris Phillips @ T O wrote: >> Hi >> >> {Not sure if this needs a new bug or not, it definitely needs a sponsor >> - Twisti ? } >> >> Attached is a backport (essentially resurrection of the Permgen code) >> of 8000780 now updated with Roman Kennke's comments. Checked and built >> against hsx24b28. (Current jdk7u-dev hs) >> >> Please review. >> >> Cheers! >> Chris >> PS >> Webrev is here: >> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero/hs24b28/ > > Hi > jdk7u-dev/hotspot corresponds to hs24-b27. > I just got the hs24 snapshot for b28 and bumped the number to b29, > Can you rework the patch/webrev against this repo: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx24/hotspot > > once it's reviewed I can push it > > Thanks > Hi The previous patch/webrev were incorrectly generated, so I have done as you requested and regenerated / tested against both hsx24b29 and jdk7u-dev (hs24b27). Webrev: http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero-hs24b29_20121222/ Chris -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: jdk7u-dev-zero-hs24b29.export Url: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/zero-dev/attachments/20121222/3a568503/jdk7u-dev-zero-hs24b29-0001.export From ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org Sat Dec 22 10:15:27 2012 From: ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org (Chris Phillips @ T O) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:15:27 -0500 Subject: RFR: 8000780 back ported Fix zero fail to build in JDK7u-dev [updated] In-Reply-To: <50D5F5EA.2020902@oracle.com> References: <50D4F1FA.7090008@LGonQn.Org> <50D5017B.20305@oracle.com> <50D53CDD.9090109@LGonQn.Org> <50D5F5EA.2020902@oracle.com> Message-ID: <50D5F8BF.1030000@LGonQn.Org> Hi Alejandro, Oops emails crossed in the net ... See my latest email , I had to regenerate the webrev and patch - This webrev s/b ok: Webrev: http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero-hs24b29_20121222/ Chris On 22/12/12 01:03 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > > Hi Chris, > In that case is not necessary. > I initially thought the webrev was against jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot > but looks like it is against hsx/hsx24/hotspot. > BTW, I went to check the webrev link and is unreachable, can you check > that? > Thanks > Alejandro > > On 12/21/2012 9:53 PM, Chris Phillips @ T O wrote: >> Hi Alejandro, >> >> The only change since I tested this afternoon is the change >> for the hotspot_version. I will re-run tests if you wish but it seems >> unnecessary. >> >> Cheers! >> Chris >> >> On 21/12/12 07:40 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: >>> On 12/21/2012 4:34 PM, Chris Phillips @ T O wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> {Not sure if this needs a new bug or not, it definitely needs a >>>> sponsor >>>> - Twisti ? } >>>> >>>> Attached is a backport (essentially resurrection of the Permgen code) >>>> of 8000780 now updated with Roman Kennke's comments. Checked and built >>>> against hsx24b28. (Current jdk7u-dev hs) >>>> >>>> Please review. >>>> >>>> Cheers! >>>> Chris >>>> PS >>>> Webrev is here: >>>> http://integral-portal.lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/jdk7u-dev-zero/hs24b28/ >>>> >>> Hi >>> jdk7u-dev/hotspot corresponds to hs24-b27. >>> I just got the hs24 snapshot for b28 and bumped the number to b29, >>> Can you rework the patch/webrev against this repo: >>> >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx24/hotspot >>> >>> once it's reviewed I can push it >>> >>> Thanks >>> > > >