[OpenJDK 2D-Dev]  Request for review: 8004859 Graphics.getClipBounds/getClip return difference nonequivalent bounds, depending from transform.
james.graham at oracle.com
Thu Dec 13 20:40:16 UTC 2012
This fix breaks other behavior.
You need to use setFrameFromDiagonal on the results of the transform
because a flip or rotation can cause the transformed points to be
unordered and setFFD will sort them as they need to be. It is the
incoming rectangle that needs to be checked for being empty, not the
results of the transform.
The case that will fail with this fix is setting the clip to a valid
rectangle in a coordinate system that is rotated by a multiple of 90
degrees or is flipped horizontally or vertically. Those cases will
result in an empty clip, but the clip was not empty coming in...
On 12/13/2012 3:08 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Please review the fix for jdk 8.
> Change description:
> 1 transformShape now symmetric to untransformShape()
> (setFrameFromDiagonal was removed).
> 2 getClipBounds now always uses getBounds2D which does not return empty
> Rectangle if the userclip has negative width or height.
> Note that if the userclip has negative width or height, our real graphic
> clip will be empty/no-area. This wasn't true before the fix for the
> scaled graphics.
> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8004859
> Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8004859/webrev.00
More information about the 2d-dev