[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR JDK-8169725: cannot use TIFFField(TIFFTag tag, int value) for TIFF_LONG values greater than Integer.MAX_VALUE

Philip Race philip.race at oracle.com
Thu Dec 8 02:41:59 UTC 2016


+1

-phil.

On 12/7/16, 5:34 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> The patch has been updated as suggested and the existing test has been modified to verify the changes:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169725/webrev.02/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
> On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:09 PM, Brian Burkhalter<brian.burkhalter at oracle.com>  wrote:
>
>> I was expecting that; will update.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Philip Race<philip.race at oracle.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Looks OK except for the same question about using 0xFFFFFFFF.
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> On 12/6/16, 12:31 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>>>> Continuing from thread [1].
>>>>
>>>> Pursuant to comments from the CCC, the patch [2] has been updated. The changes with respect to the previous version of the patch [3] are to clarify the specification of TIFFField(TIFFTag,long) in terms of the constructor’s description and the exceptions it throws, and to add an exception for the case of value>= 4294967296, i.e., above the range of a 32-bit unsigned int.
>>>>
>>>> Once this patch is approved the CCC request may be updated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-November/007963.html
>>>> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169725/webrev.01/
>>>> [3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169725/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 8:03 AM, Philip Race<philip.race at oracle.com>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> -phil



More information about the 2d-dev mailing list