[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFC: Fix for JDK-8188030

Phil Race philip.race at oracle.com
Wed Nov 15 16:46:27 UTC 2017


Can you please request 8 backport approval for this version (which I 
have approved as below)

I know some internal folks who like to see it in 8 as well and I had to 
tell them you already have a fix for 8 in hand ..

The jdk-updates project is only for 9+ so the usual old 8 rules should 
apply for this.


On 10/23/2017 12:28 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> Yes, that would work .. ie preserve the status quo .. not needed in 10 
> though, this would be 8-only.
> Are you going to push the 10 version of the fix any time soon ?
> -phil.
> On 10/19/2017 01:59 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> I think for  JDK 8 you can pass down a flag to decide whether to 
>>> include or
>>> exclude CFF.
>>> This flag would be the value of FontUtilities.isOpenJDK() and that 
>>> should
>>> tell us what we need.
>>> That would preserve the status quo for Oracle JDK and it would be our
>>> problem if the same
>>> bug were then reported against that release.
>> Is something like that what you have in mind?
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/
>> Cheers,
>> Mario

More information about the 2d-dev mailing list