[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

Prasanta Sadhukhan prasanta.sadhukhan at oracle.com
Fri Jun 22 08:29:35 UTC 2018


btw,

GetRemotePrintersNames violates camelcase style. I suggest to use getRemotePrintersNames


Regards
Prasanta
On 6/22/2018 1:56 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:
>
> Thank you Prasanta for the review.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Shashi
>
> *From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
> *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 1:42 PM
> *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah 
> <shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>; Philip Race 
> <philip.race at oracle.com>; 2d-dev <2d-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows 
> remote printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()
>
> looks good. One more thing, you could probably use
>
> if (info4->Attributes & PRINTER_ATTRIBUTE_NETWORK) {
>
> instead of hardcoding
>
> if (info4->Attributes & 0x00000010) {
>
>
> Also,
>
> getAllPrinterNames() shares more than 80% code with your recently addedGetRemotePrintersNames(). Probably we could optimise 
> getAllPrinterNames to use yours
> by having a parameter(all/remote) but it's upto you.
> Regards
> Prasanta
>
> On 6/22/2018 12:53 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:
>
>     Hi Prasanta, Thank you for the review. Here is the new Webrev:
>
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.05/
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.05/>
>
>     For the EnumPrinters case, I think the cReturned is sufficient as
>     it is set to zero every time we start.
>
>     Thanks and regards,
>
>     Shashi
>
>     *From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
>     *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 10:41 AM
>     *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
>     <shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>
>     <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>; Philip Race
>     <philip.race at oracle.com> <mailto:philip.race at oracle.com>; 2d-dev
>     <2d-dev at openjdk.java.net> <mailto:2d-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>     *Subject:* Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732:
>     Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()
>
>     I guess
>
>     if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("true")) {
>
>       70                 pollServices = true;
>
>       71             } else if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("false")) {
>
>       72                 pollServices = false;
>
>       73             }
>
>     can be written as
>
>       
>
>     if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("false"))
>
>     pollServices = false;
>
>     as it is already defaulted to true.
>
>     78          * for polling PrintServices.  The default is 120.
>
>     I guess default is 240.
>
>     also, EnumPrinters returns bool, which we should check like
>
>     263         if (cReturned > 0 && enumprintersret !=0 ) {
>
>     Regards
>
>     Prasanta
>
>     On 6/22/2018 10:03 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:
>
>         Hi Phil, Thanks for your review.
>
>         I have made your suggested changes and here is the updated webrev:
>
>         http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.04/
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.04/>
>
>         Need one more review to commit this.
>
>         Note: A network printer can be added via the ‘Add a printer’
>         under the ‘Devices and Printers’ dialog. A network printer
>         will have the property ‘Device description’ set to ‘Network
>         printer connection’.
>
>         Thanks and regards,
>
>         Shashi
>
>         *From:*Phil Race
>         *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 2:16 AM
>         *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
>         <shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>
>         <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>; 2d-dev
>         <2d-dev at openjdk.java.net> <mailto:2d-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>         *Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote
>         printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()
>
>         I thought you were going to make the refresh time 4 minutes ?
>         I don't see that it has to be the same on Windows as it was on
>         Unix,
>         if you say 4 minutes is a sensible value there .. and 4 mins
>         will be
>         less CPU wake up, so I'd back that (4 mins) ahead of 2 minutes
>         as the default here.
>
>         You still have missing white space
>
>         432             while(true) {
>
>
>         With these two changes you have my +1 ..
>
>         BTW the native diff looks MUCH better now - thanks !
>
>         -phil.
>
>         On 06/21/2018 01:33 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:
>
>             Hi Phil, Here is the new Webrev for changes you suggested.
>
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.03/
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.03/>
>
>             Thanks and regards,
>
>             Shashi
>
>             *From:*Phil Race
>             *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 1:02 AM
>             *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
>             <shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>
>             <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>; 2d-dev
>             <2d-dev at openjdk.java.net> <mailto:2d-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>             *Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows
>             remote printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()
>
>               
>
>             +        private static final long DELAY = 1000 * 60 * 4;
>             // 4 min pooling
>
>             I think we need a System Property that can control this.
>
>             I suggest the name "sun.java2d.print.minRefreshTime" which
>             is what we use on Unix.
>
>             and similarly to there we should have
>             "sun.java2d.print.polling" which is a boolean
>
>             and controls whether we do this at all ..
>
>             See
>             src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/print/PrintServiceLookupProvider.java
>
>             Lots of places where you are missing a space before "("
>
>             +            if(str1.length != str2.length) {
>
>             +                for(int i = 0;i < str1.length;i++) {
>
>             +                    for(int j = 0;j < str2.length;j++) {
>
>             +                        if(!str1[i].equals(str2[j])) {
>
>               
>
>             +            while(true) {
>
>             +                if(doCompare(prevRemotePrinters,
>             currentRemotePrinters)) {
>
>             There's some of that in native too
>
>             266                 if(info4->Attributes & 0x00000010) {
>
>             In
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/WPrinterJob.cpp.sdiff.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/WPrinterJob.cpp.sdiff.html>
>
>             you seem to have moved all the existing and (I think)
>             unchanged related functions so the DIFF appears
>
>             much bigger than it really is. Please move them back and
>             re-generate.
>
>             The test really needs to provide an "out" for someone
>             running the test who has no way
>
>             to add a network printer .. they don't want to have to
>             fail the test.
>
>             As well as that, arguably this should be an @ignore test,
>             so it is not run unless
>
>             you are trying to run all the tests.
>
>             -phil.
>
>             On 06/21/2018 12:08 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:
>
>                 Hi Phil, Here is the new Webrev. I chose 4 mins
>                 because I think it takes around 2 mins to add a new
>                 network printer, hence I felt 4 mins is a good time.
>
>                 The windows **PrinterChangeNotifications** calls are a
>                 blocking function calls hence I could not add the
>                 remote printers monitor to the existing thread. Hence
>                 there is a new thread being added to listen to remote
>                 printers status changes.
>
>                 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/
>                 <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/>
>
>                 Thanks and regards,
>
>                 Shashi
>
>                 *From:*Philip Race
>                 *Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2018 5:38 AM
>                 *To:* 2d-dev <2d-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>                 <mailto:2d-dev at openjdk.java.net>; Shashidhara
>                 Veerabhadraiah <shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>
>                 <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>
>                 *Subject:* Fwd: Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732:
>                 Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in
>                 lookupPrintServices()
>
>                 The main concern I have is we now have a busy thread
>                 burning CPU ..
>                 bad for laptops .. and if we add a delay we have less
>                 prompt notification
>                 of a new local printer.
>
>                 I think the compromise is that the existing thread
>                 maybe kept as is,
>                 and we add a new thread that pools every 10 minutes
>                 for a remote printer.
>
>                 If we can make the existing thread wake up from its
>                 wait and do that, even better.
>
>                 -phil.
>
>                 -------- Original Message --------
>
>                 *Subject: *
>
>                 	
>
>                 Re: [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote printer changes
>                 do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()
>
>                 *Date: *
>
>                 	
>
>                 Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:03:56 -0700
>
>                 *From: *
>
>                 	
>
>                 Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com>
>                 <mailto:philip.race at oracle.com>
>
>                 *Organization: *
>
>                 	
>
>                 Oracle Corporation
>
>                 *To: *
>
>                 	
>
>                 Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
>                 <shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>
>                 <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadraiah at oracle.com>
>
>                 *CC: *
>
>                 	
>
>                 awt-dev at openjdk.java.net
>                 <mailto:awt-dev at openjdk.java.net>,
>                 swing-dev at openjdk.java.net
>                 <mailto:swing-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>
>
>
>                 This is on the wrong lists. Not Swing. Not AWT. Should
>                 be 2d.
>                 I'll forward it there and continue there. Consider the
>                 AWT+Swing threads dead.
>
>                 -phil.
>
>                 On 6/20/18, 3:12 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:
>
>                     Hi All, Please review this code changes for the
>                     below enhancement.
>
>                     Enhancement:
>                     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732
>
>                     Webrev:
>                     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.00/
>                     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.00/>
>
>                     Details of the changes: Windows provides
>                     *PrinterChangeNotification* functions that
>                     provides information about printer status changes
>                     of the local printers(subset) but not network
>                     printers.
>                     Alternatively, Windows provides a way thro' which
>                     one can get the network printer status changes by
>                     using WMI, RegistryKeyChange combination, which is
>                     a slightly complex mechanism.
>                     The Windows WMI offers an async and sync method to
>                     read thro' registry via the WQL query. The async
>                     method is considered dangerous as it leaves open a
>                     channel until we close it. But the async method
>                     has the advantage of being notified of a change in
>                     registry by calling callback without polling for
>                     it. The sync method uses the polling mechanism to
>                     notify.
>                     RegistryValueChange cannot be used in combination
>                     with WMI to get registry value change notification
>                     because of an error that may be generated because
>                     the scope of the query would be too big to
>                     handle(at times).
>                     Hence an alternative mechanism is choosen via the
>                     EnumPrinters by polling for the count of printer
>                     status changes(add\remove) and based on it update
>                     the printers list(both local and remote printers -
>                     superset).
>
>                     Thanks and regards,
>
>                     Shashi
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20180622/638fd2a5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the 2d-dev mailing list