[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <AWT Dev> libfontmanager.so: undefined symbol: hb_font_destroy in openjdk17~14
philip.race at oracle.com
Tue Mar 30 05:33:36 UTC 2021
On 3/29/21 8:14 PM, mc36 wrote:
> please dont! i got ~15 and the issue is gone!
please don't do what ?
> (but answering line by line, who knows)
Ok. So it looks like you are using some debian build of openjdk and it
it can't find the system libharfbuzz.so since that symbol is very basic.
If you use the one from https://jdk.java.net/17/ I expect it will work
since it does
what the JDK 15 does that I suggested.
I can't tell what the JDK 16 you have does since I'd need to see an ls
-l of your
> On 3/29/21 6:41 PM, Philip Race wrote:
>> Moving this to the right list.
>> There's lots of missing information in your email.
>> 1) I don't know what a debian sid is. Internet suggests it is some
>> upstream dev version
>> Is this reproducible on any shipping distro ?
> yesss, it is. https://www.debian.org/
> the only difference that you replace stable to
> unstable/sid/experimental,depending how brave you're.... :)
>> 2) Where exactly did you get the openjdk build 17 ? Was it from
>> https://jdk.java.net/17/ or somewhere else ?
>> Please show the output of "java -version" to help confirm it.
> sudo apt install openjdk-17-jre -- to get the latest build of them....
> at the moment i see the following version:
> mc36 at noti:~$ java -version
> openjdk version "17-ea" 2021-09-14
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17-ea+15-Debian-1)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 17-ea+15-Debian-1, mixed mode, sharing)
> mc36 at noti:~$
>> 3) What doesÂ "ls -l lib/libfontmanager.so" show ?
> mc36 at noti:~$ find /lib/ -name libfontmanager.so
> mc36 at noti:~$ ls -lsa /lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/libfontmanager.so
> 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 55960 Mar 25 10:31
> mc36 at noti:~$
>> 4) What was the JDK version you had immediately before this and where
>> did you get that ?
> i have all that is available in the distro, but it depends, my older
> installations have something from java6 times :)
>> 5) Does either JDK 11u or JDK15u work in this respect on that system ?
> yesss, right now, every installed jvm works perfectly, i olny saw the
> issue with 17~14!!!!
> then, for a while i sudo update-alternatives --config java 'ed to 16,
> but when they bumped
> to ~15, the i reverted to auto, that is 17, and the issue is
> completely gone, now all the
> jvms i have works fine!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the 2d-dev