From sadhak001 at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 23:14:40 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 00:14:40 +0100 Subject: AdoptOpenJDK community newsletter is out! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=562ccf50-49ab-11e4-9cdc-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription Plenty on JavaOne this time :) -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Oct 7 09:49:12 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:49:12 +0100 Subject: Quick note post J1 Message-ID: Hi all, At the Hackergarden a couple of decent Hotspot patches were supplied by some Adoption members from Japan. get_source.sh now works in a Japanese shell and hs_err on core dumps can now provide more detailed information from the latest Linux kernel. In London we'll be hosting the next OpenJDK hack day on the 18t of October, focusing on the Betterrev application (OpenJDK 9 integration and Java EE 7 / Angular JS port) Cheers, Martijn From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com Tue Oct 7 10:04:09 2014 From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:04:09 +0200 Subject: Quick note post J1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Was amazing to see this happening live. I'm thinking we should organise an Hackergarden at FOSDEM as well, what do you think? Cheers, Mario 2014-10-07 11:49 GMT+02:00 Martijn Verburg : > Hi all, > > At the Hackergarden a couple of decent Hotspot patches were supplied by > some Adoption members from Japan. get_source.sh now works in a Japanese > shell and hs_err on core dumps can now provide more detailed information > from the latest Linux kernel. > > In London we'll be hosting the next OpenJDK hack day on the 18t of October, > focusing on the Betterrev application (OpenJDK 9 integration and Java EE 7 > / Angular JS port) > > Cheers, > Martijn -- pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/ From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Oct 7 10:28:28 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:28:28 +0100 Subject: Quick note post J1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Mario, I personally won't have time at FOSDEM to help - from past experience I know that the two days are fully tied up with Hallway track :-) Cheers, Martijn On 7 October 2014 11:04, Mario Torre wrote: > Was amazing to see this happening live. > > I'm thinking we should organise an Hackergarden at FOSDEM as well, > what do you think? > > Cheers, > Mario > > 2014-10-07 11:49 GMT+02:00 Martijn Verburg : > > Hi all, > > > > At the Hackergarden a couple of decent Hotspot patches were supplied by > > some Adoption members from Japan. get_source.sh now works in a Japanese > > shell and hs_err on core dumps can now provide more detailed information > > from the latest Linux kernel. > > > > In London we'll be hosting the next OpenJDK hack day on the 18t of > October, > > focusing on the Betterrev application (OpenJDK 9 integration and Java EE > 7 > > / Angular JS port) > > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > -- > pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF > Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF > > Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens > Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ > Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org > OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ > > Please, support open standards: > http://endsoftpatents.org/ > From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Wed Oct 8 10:09:22 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:09:22 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 early access b33 test results now available Message-ID: <54350D52.1060708@oracle.com> JDK 9 ea b33 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 11 differences from the b32 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b32/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,849; fail: 11; not run: 1,541 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b33/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,851; fail: 8; not run: 1,547 0 1 Test pass --- com/sun/jdi/RedefinePop.sh fail --- java/lang/instrument/NativeMethodPrefixAgent.java pass --- java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/FindDeadlocks.java pass --- java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadMXBeanStateTest.java fail pass java/net/InetAddress/IPv4Formats.java fail pass java/rmi/activation/rmidViaInheritedChannel/RmidViaInheritedChannel.java --- pass java/security/spec/PKCS8EncodedKeySpec/Algorithm.java --- pass javax/imageio/MultiReadTest.java --- pass javax/xml/ws/xsanymixed/Test.java pass --- sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/MonitorVmStartTerminate.java --- pass tools/jar/LeadingGarbage.java 11 differences The hotspot test results contain 10 differences from the b32 test results. There is 1 new failure , this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b32/hotspot/JTwork pass: 608; fail: 30; error: 2; not run: 30 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b33/hotspot/JTwork pass: 614; fail: 30; error: 2; not run: 30 0 1 Test --- pass compiler/osr/TestRangeCheck.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestParallelHeapSizeFlags.java fail --- gc/g1/TestDeferredRSUpdate.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkDefragmentedHeap.java --- pass runtime/7158988/FieldMonitor.java --- pass runtime/CompressedOops/CompressedClassSpaceSize.java --- pass runtime/CompressedOops/ObjectAlignment.java --- pass runtime/CompressedOops/UseCompressedOops.java pass --- runtime/NMT/MallocTrackingVerify.java --- pass runtime/memory/LargePages/TestLargePageSizeInBytes.java 10 differences The langtools test results contain 1 difference from the b32 test results. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b32/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,113; not run: 14 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b33/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,114; not run: 14 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/lambda/T8057794.java 1 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/b33/emailable-report.html -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed Oct 8 21:49:11 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:49:11 +0100 Subject: AdoptOpenJDK newsletter is out! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=68ee4030-4f2b-11e4-a0b2-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription This week plenty on JavaOne and Nashorn! Cheers, Mani -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Thu Oct 9 09:17:13 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:17:13 +0100 Subject: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b33 and JDK 8u40 b09 are available on java.net Message-ID: <54365299.5000800@oracle.com> Hi All, Early Access build for JDK 9 b33 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here Early Access build for JDK 8u40 b09 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here. Rgds,Rory -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Thu Oct 9 12:29:39 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:29:39 +0100 Subject: JDK 8u40 ea b09 test results now available Message-ID: <54367FB3.4010109@oracle.com> JDK 8u40 ea b09 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk and langtools test results contain 0 differences from the b08 test results. The hotspot test results contain 7 differences from the b08 test results. There is 1 new failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b08/hotspot/JTwork pass: 583; fail: 35; error: 2; not run: 16 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b09/hotspot/JTwork pass: 587; fail: 33; error: 2; not run: 16 0 1 Test fail pass compiler/whitebox/DeoptimizeMethodTest.java pass fail compiler/whitebox/GetNMethodTest.java fail pass compiler/whitebox/MakeMethodNotCompilableTest.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestG1ConcRefinementThreads.java fail --- gc/g1/TestDeferredRSUpdate.java --- pass runtime/LoadClass/ShowClassLoader.java --- pass runtime/NMT/UnsafeMallocLimit2.java 7 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u40-b09/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Fri Oct 10 09:29:55 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:29:55 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 early access b34 test results now available Message-ID: <5437A713.8040600@oracle.com> JDK 9 ea b34 test results are now available at : http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 3 differences from the b33 test results. There are no new testcase failures. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b33/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,851; fail: 8; not run: 1,547 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b34/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,854; fail: 8; not run: 1,547 0 1 Test --- pass java/util/logging/FileHandlerPath.java --- pass java/util/logging/FileHandlerPatternExceptions.java --- pass java/util/logging/TestConfigurationListeners.java 3 differences The hotspot test results contain 4 differences from the b33 test results. There are 2 new failures, those failures are under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b33/hotspot/JTwork pass: 614; fail: 30; error: 2; not run: 30 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b34/hotspot/JTwork pass: 616; fail: 32; error: 1; not run: 30 0 1 Test --- fail compiler/codecache/CheckSegmentedCodeCache.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/multiplytolen/TestMultiplyToLenReturnProfile.java --- pass compiler/unsafe/UnsafeRaw.java error fail serviceability/dcmd/CodelistTest.java 4 differences The langtools test results contain 1 differences from the b33 test results. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b33/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,114; not run: 14 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b34/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,113; not run: 14 0 1 Test pass --- tools/javac/UncaughtOverflow2.java 1 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/b34/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From julius.gb at gmail.com Wed Oct 15 22:21:46 2014 From: julius.gb at gmail.com (Julius Gamanyi) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:21:46 +0100 Subject: My blog post about the OpenJDK hackday in London Message-ID: Hi All, I've been to a few OpenJDK hackdays in London. There's another hackday coming up this Saturday. For the hackday in May, I blogged about it internally where I work (Accenture). Some people liked it. I'm hoping some others might find it of interest. Here's a link to the post via Evernote - https://www.evernote.com/shard/s198/sh/f7caa244-9df4-478d-8b83-cd1f863c3f6b/e128a0121c643a62 . I'm open to, and welcome, feedback. I'e found it enjoyable promoting the OpenJDK and encouraging people to come for the Hackdays. Thanks to the LJC and Salesforce for hosting the hackdays. Julius From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed Oct 15 22:48:16 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:48:16 +0100 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK newsletter is out! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=92f8d7c0-54ab-11e4-9b38-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription Happy reading! -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From martijnverburg at gmail.com Thu Oct 16 10:57:51 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:57:51 +0100 Subject: My blog post about the OpenJDK hackday in London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Julius, Great stuff! Some small nitpicks. OpenJDK is usually captilised as I have with the start of this sentence. And we typically refer to it as OpenJDK as opposed to "the OpenJDK" Really interesting post, thanks and I hope this inspires more of you to come out or organise your own! Cheers, Martijn On 15 October 2014 23:21, Julius Gamanyi wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been to a few OpenJDK hackdays in London. There's another hackday > coming up this Saturday. For the hackday in May, I blogged about it > internally where I work (Accenture). Some people liked it. I'm hoping some > others might find it of interest. > > Here's a link to the post via Evernote - > > https://www.evernote.com/shard/s198/sh/f7caa244-9df4-478d-8b83-cd1f863c3f6b/e128a0121c643a62 > . > > I'm open to, and welcome, feedback. > > I'e found it enjoyable promoting the OpenJDK and encouraging people to come > for the Hackdays. > > Thanks to the LJC and Salesforce for hosting the hackdays. > > Julius > From julius.gb at gmail.com Thu Oct 16 23:00:18 2014 From: julius.gb at gmail.com (Julius Gamanyi) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:18 +0100 Subject: My blog post about the OpenJDK hackday in London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Martijn, I've update the notes with the more appropriate capitalised "OpenJDK," removed the unnecessary article, and added a postscript stating the changes. Thanks, Julius -- Julius e: julius.gb at gmail.com On 16 October 2014 11:57, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Julius, > > Great stuff! Some small nitpicks. OpenJDK is usually captilised as I > have with the start of this sentence. And we typically refer to it as > OpenJDK as opposed to "the OpenJDK" > > Really interesting post, thanks and I hope this inspires more of you to > come out or organise your own! > > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 15 October 2014 23:21, Julius Gamanyi wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've been to a few OpenJDK hackdays in London. There's another hackday >> coming up this Saturday. For the hackday in May, I blogged about it >> internally where I work (Accenture). Some people liked it. I'm hoping some >> others might find it of interest. >> >> Here's a link to the post via Evernote - >> >> https://www.evernote.com/shard/s198/sh/f7caa244-9df4-478d-8b83-cd1f863c3f6b/e128a0121c643a62 >> . >> >> I'm open to, and welcome, feedback. >> >> I'e found it enjoyable promoting the OpenJDK and encouraging people to >> come >> for the Hackdays. >> >> Thanks to the LJC and Salesforce for hosting the hackdays. >> >> Julius >> > > From sadhak001 at gmail.com Thu Oct 16 23:35:16 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:35:16 +0100 Subject: My blog post about the OpenJDK hackday in London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good one Julius, glad you got your article out into the social media and mailing lists. +1 to Martijn's comments. Cheers, Mani On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Julius Gamanyi wrote: > Thanks Martijn, > > I've update the notes with the more appropriate capitalised "OpenJDK," > removed the unnecessary article, and added a postscript stating the > changes. > > Thanks, > Julius > > -- > Julius > e: julius.gb at gmail.com > > On 16 October 2014 11:57, Martijn Verburg > wrote: > > > Hi Julius, > > > > Great stuff! Some small nitpicks. OpenJDK is usually captilised as I > > have with the start of this sentence. And we typically refer to it as > > OpenJDK as opposed to "the OpenJDK" > > > > Really interesting post, thanks and I hope this inspires more of you to > > come out or organise your own! > > > > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > On 15 October 2014 23:21, Julius Gamanyi wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I've been to a few OpenJDK hackdays in London. There's another hackday > >> coming up this Saturday. For the hackday in May, I blogged about it > >> internally where I work (Accenture). Some people liked it. I'm hoping > some > >> others might find it of interest. > >> > >> Here's a link to the post via Evernote - > >> > >> > https://www.evernote.com/shard/s198/sh/f7caa244-9df4-478d-8b83-cd1f863c3f6b/e128a0121c643a62 > >> . > >> > >> I'm open to, and welcome, feedback. > >> > >> I'e found it enjoyable promoting the OpenJDK and encouraging people to > >> come > >> for the Hackdays. > >> > >> Thanks to the LJC and Salesforce for hosting the hackdays. > >> > >> Julius > >> > > > > > -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk Fri Oct 17 10:56:24 2014 From: daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk (Daniel Bryant) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:56:24 +0100 Subject: My blog post about the OpenJDK hackday in London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5440F5D8.4020504@tai-dev.co.uk> Good point Mani - in the future feel free to give us all a nudge via this list if you want a re-tweet for your blog links etc. It's always good to promote this stuff to the community at-large :-) Best wishes, Daniel On 17/10/2014 00:35, Mani Sarkar wrote: > Good one Julius, glad you got your article out into the social media and > mailing lists. > > +1 to Martijn's comments. > > Cheers, > Mani > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Julius Gamanyi > wrote: > >> Thanks Martijn, >> >> I've update the notes with the more appropriate capitalised "OpenJDK," >> removed the unnecessary article, and added a postscript stating the >> changes. >> >> Thanks, >> Julius >> >> -- >> Julius >> e: julius.gb at gmail.com >> >> On 16 October 2014 11:57, Martijn Verburg >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Julius, >>> >>> Great stuff! Some small nitpicks. OpenJDK is usually captilised as I >>> have with the start of this sentence. And we typically refer to it as >>> OpenJDK as opposed to "the OpenJDK" >>> >>> Really interesting post, thanks and I hope this inspires more of you to >>> come out or organise your own! >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 15 October 2014 23:21, Julius Gamanyi wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I've been to a few OpenJDK hackdays in London. There's another hackday >>>> coming up this Saturday. For the hackday in May, I blogged about it >>>> internally where I work (Accenture). Some people liked it. I'm hoping >> some >>>> others might find it of interest. >>>> >>>> Here's a link to the post via Evernote - >>>> >>>> >> https://www.evernote.com/shard/s198/sh/f7caa244-9df4-478d-8b83-cd1f863c3f6b/e128a0121c643a62 >>>> . >>>> >>>> I'm open to, and welcome, feedback. >>>> >>>> I'e found it enjoyable promoting the OpenJDK and encouraging people to >>>> come >>>> for the Hackdays. >>>> >>>> Thanks to the LJC and Salesforce for hosting the hackdays. >>>> >>>> Julius >>>> >>> > > From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Tue Oct 21 10:14:22 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:14:22 +0100 Subject: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b35 and JDK 8u40 b10 are available on java.net Message-ID: <544631FE.4020108@oracle.com> Hi All, Early Access build for JDK 9 b35 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here Early Access build for JDK 8u40 b10 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here. Rgds,Rory -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Tue Oct 21 10:39:04 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:39:04 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 early access b35 test results now available Message-ID: <544637C8.5060001@oracle.com> JDK 9 ea b35 test results are now available at : http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 14 differences from the b34 test results. There is one new testcase failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b34/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,854; fail: 8; not run: 1,547 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b35/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,864; fail: 9; not run: 1,547 0 1 Test pass fail java/lang/invoke/LFCaching/LFSingleThreadCachingTest.java --- pass java/util/logging/Logger/entering/LoggerEnteringWithParams.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/test/rowset/RowSetFactoryTests.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/test/rowset/RowSetProviderTests.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/util/StubCachedRowSetImpl.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/util/StubFilteredRowSetImpl.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/util/StubJdbcRowSetImpl.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/util/StubJoinRowSetImpl.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/util/StubRowSetFactory.java --- pass javax/sql/testng/util/StubWebRowSetImpl.java --- pass sun/management/jdp/JdpDefaultsTest.java --- pass sun/management/jdp/JdpOffTest.java --- pass sun/management/jdp/JdpSpecificAddressTest.java pass --- sun/management/jdp/JdpTest.sh 14 differences The hotspot test results contain 22 differences from the b34 test results. There are 6 failures, those failures are under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b34/hotspot/JTwork pass: 616; fail: 32; error: 1; not run: 30 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b35/hotspot/JTwork pass: 623; fail: 37; error: 1; not run: 34 0 1 Test --- pass compiler/jsr292/NullConstantReceiver.java --- pass compiler/jsr292/VMAnonymousClasses.java pass --- gc/8000311/Test8000311.java pass --- gc/TestG1ZeroPGCTJcmdThreadPrint.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestG1ConcRefinementThreads.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestParallelGCThreads.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData00.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData05.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData10.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData15.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData20.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData25.java --- pass gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData30.java --- pass gc/metaspace/TestCapacityUntilGCWrapAround.java --- pass runtime/LoadClass/ShowClassLoader.java --- pass runtime/NMT/UnsafeMallocLimit2.java pass --- serviceability/dcmd/CodeCacheTest.java fail --- serviceability/dcmd/CodelistTest.java pass --- serviceability/dcmd/CompilerQueueTest.java --- pass serviceability/dcmd/compiler/CodeCacheTest.java --- pass serviceability/dcmd/compiler/CodelistTest.java --- pass serviceability/dcmd/compiler/CompilerQueueTest.java 22 differences The langtools test results contain 4 differences from the b34 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b34/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,113; not run: 14 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b35/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,117; not run: 14 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MethodReferenceArrayClone.java --- pass tools/sjavac/DependencyCollection.java --- pass tools/sjavac/IncCompInheritance.java --- pass tools/sjavac/PackagePathMismatch.java 4 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/b35/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Tue Oct 21 10:44:52 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:44:52 +0100 Subject: JDK 8u40 ea b10 test results now available Message-ID: <54463924.2080302@oracle.com> JDK 8u40 ea b10 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 7 differences from the b09 test results. There is one new testcase failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b09/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,748; fail: 13; not run: 982 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b10/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,753; fail: 14; not run: 983 0 1 Test --- pass com/sun/jdi/EvalInterfaceStatic.sh --- pass com/sun/jdi/InterfaceMethodsTest.java --- pass com/sun/jdi/VisibleMethods.java --- pass java/util/logging/FileHandlerPath.java --- pass javax/xml/ws/xsanymixed/Test.java --- pass sun/security/jgss/spnego/NotPreferredMech.java pass fail sun/security/ssl/sanity/ciphersuites/CipherSuitesInOrder.java 7 differences The hotspot test results contain 3 differences from the b09 test results. There is one new testcase failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b09/hotspot/JTwork pass: 587; fail: 33; error: 2; not run: 16 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b10/hotspot/JTwork pass: 588; fail: 33; error: 2; not run: 16 0 1 Test --- pass compiler/osr/TestRangeCheck.java fail pass compiler/whitebox/GetNMethodTest.java pass fail compiler/whitebox/MakeMethodNotCompilableTest.java 3 differences The langtools test result contain 0 differences from the b09 test results. The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u40-b10/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From neugens at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:10:11 2014 From: neugens at redhat.com (Mario Torre) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:10:11 +0200 Subject: FreeJava DevRoom - Call for Paper 2015 Message-ID: <1413997811.14618.1.camel@nirvana.localdomain> We are pleased to announce the Call for Participation in the FOSDEM 2015 Free Java DevRoom! This marks the 12th year that the Free Java DevRoom has been a part of FOSDEM, and also marks 20 years of Java! This year FOSDEM Free Java DevRoom will be 31 January & 1 February 2015 in Brussels, Belgium, with usual additional events and meetings on Friday, Saturday and Sunday; please, refer to the FOSDEM website for the schedule of the whole event: https://fosdem.org/2015/ The Free Java DevRoom has become unique in that it has attracted hackers from very different Free Software Java projects, giving the opportunity to bring together companies of various sizes, different project communities, mainstream core Java developers, alternative Java language implementations and runtimes, and everything that form the Free Java Universe, everybody participating to share their knowledge in an atmosphere of cooperation and friendly competition. It has been a long journey so far, exciting and fun, and hard at times. But together we have made it, and Java today more than ever can count on a dynamic and vibrant Community, innovation due to participation, and a user base that is continually growing. We won't sit and rest on the paved road we built, though! We are eager to contribute to the next "20 years of excellence", and we want you to be part of it! As always, check out our wiki for more details on the conference: http://wiki.debian.org/Java/DevJam/2015/Fosdem And join the Free Java DevoRoom mailing list [java-devroom at lists.fosdem.org]: https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/java-devroom *** IMPORTANT *** Fosdem organisers have expressed the desire to record everything, and we will do our best to record the sessions by default. If you wish to NOT be recorded please write clearly so in the proposal. Please submit one (or more) 25 minute talk proposal(s) by the 1st of December 2014, 23.59 CET on the mailing list. We will also select a small number of 45 minutes talk. If you wish to submit a 45 minutes talk please state this in the proposal, all proposals will be considered to be of 25 minute by default otherwise. A template for submitting a talk can be found at: http://wiki.debian.org/Java/DevJam/2015/Fosdem/CallForParticipation Tracks will be announced around 10th of December on the mailing list. Please join us! --The Free Java DevRoom Organizing Committee From sadhak001 at gmail.com Thu Oct 23 21:45:11 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:45:11 +0100 Subject: AdoptOpenJDK newsletter is out! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=55bd55d0-5a2c-11e4-819f-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Fri Oct 24 11:39:33 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:39:33 +0100 Subject: JDK 8u40 ea b11 test results now available Message-ID: <544A3A75.4070703@oracle.com> JDK 8u40 ea b11 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 2 differences from the b10 test results. There is one testcase failure with error, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b10/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,753; fail: 14; not run: 983 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b11/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,753; fail: 13; error: 1; not run: 983 0 1 Test fail pass sun/security/ssl/sanity/ciphersuites/CipherSuitesInOrder.java pass error sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdExternalRegistry.java 2 differences The hotspot test results contain 9 differences from the b10 test results. There are 5 testcase failures, those failures are under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b10/hotspot/JTwork pass: 588; fail: 33; error: 2; not run: 16 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b11/hotspot/JTwork pass: 592; fail: 37; error: 2; not run: 16 0 1 Test fail pass compiler/whitebox/EnqueueMethodForCompilationTest.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData00.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData05.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData10.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData15.java --- fail gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData20.java --- pass gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData25.java --- pass gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData30.java --- pass gc/metaspace/TestCapacityUntilGCWrapAround.java 9 differences The langtools test result contain 0 differences from the b10 test results. The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u40-b11/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From martijnverburg at gmail.com Fri Oct 24 17:35:31 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:35:31 +0100 Subject: Fwd: JEP 218: Generics over Primitive Types In-Reply-To: <20141024152244.61C783F2C3@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20141024152244.61C783F2C3@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: The beginning of the road to value types - sort of - well not really, but a very interesting change for Java nonetheless! First idle thought - could this still work on older VMs by default of ignoring the additional bytecode specialisation and just using old Boxed primitive collections. Needless to say the LJC will start running hackdays on this feature as Brain et al have some prototypes to throw our way. Cheers, Martijn ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: 24 October 2014 16:22 Subject: JEP 218: Generics over Primitive Types To: brian.goetz at oracle.com Cc: valhalla-dev at openjdk.java.net New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/218 - Mark From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Wed Oct 29 16:28:30 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:28:30 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 early access b36 test results now available Message-ID: <545115AE.5040709@oracle.com> JDK 9 ea b36 test results are now available at : http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 49 differences from the b35 test results. There is one new testcase failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b35/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,864; fail: 9; not run: 1,547 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b36/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,877; fail: 9; not run: 1,551 0 1 Test fail pass java/lang/invoke/LFCaching/LFSingleThreadCachingTest.java --- pass java/net/SetFactoryPermission/SetFactoryPermission.java --- pass java/net/SocketPermission/SocketPermissionTest.java --- pass java/util/concurrent/FutureTask/NegativeTimeout.java --- pass javax/naming/spi/providers/InitialContextTest.java pass fail javax/sound/midi/Gervill/SoftProvider/GetDevice.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/MidiDeviceProvider/NullInfo.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/MidiDeviceProvider/UnsupportedInfo.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/BaseTest.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/BasicTest.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/FixedAttrTest.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IdIdrefCheckingTest.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IdentityConstraintCheckingTest.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_A_A.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_A_C.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_A.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_AC.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_C.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_CA.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/RootTypeDefinitionTest.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/SpecialCaseErrorHandler.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/UnparsedEntityCheckingTest.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/UseGrammarPoolOnlyTest_False.java pass --- javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/8037819/UseGrammarPoolOnlyTest_True.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/BaseTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/SpecialCaseErrorHandler.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8036951/FeaturePropagationTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8036951/RootSimpleTypeDefinitionTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8036951/RootTypeDefinitionTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8036951/Xerces1128doc1Test.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8036951/Xerces1128doc2Test.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/BasicTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/BasicTest1.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/FixedAttrTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IdIdrefCheckingTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IdentityConstraintCheckingTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_A_A.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_A_C.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_A.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_AC.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_C.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/IgnoreXSITypeTest_C_CA.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/RootTypeDefinitionTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/UnparsedEntityCheckingTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/UseGrammarPoolOnlyTest_False.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/testng/validation/jdk8037819/UseGrammarPoolOnlyTest_True.java --- pass sun/security/tools/keytool/keyalg.sh pass --- tools/jar/normalize/TestNormal.java --- pass tools/pack200/TestNormal.java 49 differences The hotspot test results contain 1 difference from the b35 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b35/hotspot/JTwork pass: 623; fail: 37; error: 1; not run: 34 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b36/hotspot/JTwork pass: 624; fail: 37; error: 1; not run: 34 0 1 Test --- pass compiler/exceptions/CatchInlineExceptions.java 1 differences The langtools test results contain 5 differences from the b35 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b35/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,117; not run: 14 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b36/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,122; not run: 14 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/classfiles/attributes/LineNumberTable/LineNumberTest.java --- pass tools/javac/generics/inference/8058199/T8058199.java --- pass tools/javac/generics/inference/8058511/T8058511a.java --- pass tools/javac/generics/inference/8058511/T8058511b.java --- pass tools/javac/generics/inference/8058511/T8058511c.java 5 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/b36/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Thu Oct 30 16:13:32 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:13:32 +0000 Subject: JDK 8u40 ea b12 test results now available Message-ID: <545263AC.5060902@oracle.com> JDK 8u40 ea b12 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 1 difference from the b11 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b11/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,753; fail: 13; error: 1; not run: 983 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b12/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,754; fail: 13; error: 1; not run: 987 0 1 Test --- pass java/net/ResponseCache/Test2.java 1 differences The hotspot test results contain 4 differences from the b11 test results. There are 2 testcase failures, those failures are under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b11/hotspot/JTwork pass: 592; fail: 37; error: 2; not run: 16 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b12/hotspot/JTwork pass: 592; fail: 39; error: 2; not run: 16 0 1 Test --- pass compiler/exceptions/CatchInlineExceptions.java pass fail compiler/whitebox/DeoptimizeMethodTest.java pass fail compiler/whitebox/EnqueueMethodForCompilationTest.java --- pass runtime/NMT/ChangeTrackingLevel.java 4 differences The langtools test results contain 2 differences from the b11 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b11/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,046; not run: 7 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u40-b12/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,048; not run: 7 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/flow/T8042741/LambdaArgumentsTest.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MethodReferenceArrayClone.java 2 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u40-b12/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From martijnverburg at gmail.com Thu Oct 30 17:33:39 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:33:39 +0000 Subject: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted In-Reply-To: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: Cheers, Martijn ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: 30 October 2014 17:30 Subject: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 -- Modular Run-Time Images This JEP will soon be proposed for JDK 9. Please direct questions and comments to the jigsaw-dev list. - Mark From sadhak001 at gmail.com Thu Oct 30 21:33:35 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:33:35 +0000 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK Community Newsletter is out! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=7eac9250-5fac-11e4-b53b-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription Enjoy news on #nashorn, #jvm, #lambdas, et al! -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Fri Oct 31 08:30:10 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:30:10 +0000 Subject: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted In-Reply-To: References: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: <54534892.9040005@oracle.com> Thanks Martijn, Will let you all know when the EA builds become available, your help with testing these builds will be much appreciated. Rgds,Rory On 30/10/2014 17:33, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Cheers, > Martijn > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: > Date: 30 October 2014 17:30 > Subject: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted > To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net > > > http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 -- Modular Run-Time Images > > This JEP will soon be proposed for JDK 9. Please direct questions > and comments to the jigsaw-dev list. > > - Mark -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From martijnverburg at gmail.com Fri Oct 31 08:57:52 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:57:52 +0000 Subject: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted In-Reply-To: <54534892.9040005@oracle.com> References: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> <54534892.9040005@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Rory, Does the quality group have a wiki? I'm thinking that we list the areas to test and how to test them there and then have both Jigsaw and Adoption groups link to that material, we can probably use the Adoption GitHub group to build any code tutorials (like with lambdas and date and time). Cheers, Martijn On 31 October 2014 08:30, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > Thanks Martijn, > > Will let you all know when the EA builds become available, your help with > testing these > builds will be much appreciated. > > Rgds,Rory > On 30/10/2014 17:33, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: >> Date: 30 October 2014 17:30 >> Subject: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted >> To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net >> >> >> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 -- Modular Run-Time Images >> >> This JEP will soon be proposed for JDK 9. Please direct questions >> and comments to the jigsaw-dev list. >> >> - Mark >> > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Fri Oct 31 09:09:42 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:09:42 +0000 Subject: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted In-Reply-To: References: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> <54534892.9040005@oracle.com> Message-ID: <545351D6.9090009@oracle.com> Hi Martijn, We are still working the Quality group lead issue, in the mean time I will work with Dalibor on this an come back to you. I will ping all the FOSS projects listed on the Quality Outreach wiki asking them to test their tools, libraries, and applications against these builds to help tease out any compatibility issues. Rgds,Rory On 31/10/2014 08:57, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Rory, > > Does the quality group have a wiki? I'm thinking that we list the > areas to test and how to test them there and then have both Jigsaw and > Adoption groups link to that material, we can probably use the > Adoption GitHub group to build any code tutorials (like with lambdas > and date and time). > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 31 October 2014 08:30, Rory O'Donnell > wrote: > > Thanks Martijn, > > Will let you all know when the EA builds become available, your > help with testing these > builds will be much appreciated. > > Rgds,Rory > On 30/10/2014 17:33, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Cheers, > Martijn > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: > > Date: 30 October 2014 17:30 > Subject: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted > To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net > > > http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 -- Modular Run-Time Images > > This JEP will soon be proposed for JDK 9. Please direct questions > and comments to the jigsaw-dev list. > > - Mark > > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From martijnverburg at gmail.com Fri Oct 31 09:20:37 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:20:37 +0000 Subject: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted In-Reply-To: <545351D6.9090009@oracle.com> References: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> <54534892.9040005@oracle.com> <545351D6.9090009@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Rory, Ah, there's the link! Quick note that there's no (obvious?) link from your Group page on openjdk.java.net to the wiki, might want to add that in. Sounds good on the rest, I think we'll have to cast the net even wider for 9, I'll have a think about how we can reach the corporations, perhaps through some JCP outreach. Cheers, Martijn On 31 October 2014 09:09, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > We are still working the Quality group lead issue, in the mean time I will > work with Dalibor on this an come back to you. > > I will ping all the FOSS projects listed on the Quality Outreach wiki > asking > them to > test their tools, libraries, and applications against these builds to help > tease out > any compatibility issues. > > Rgds,Rory > > On 31/10/2014 08:57, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi Rory, > > Does the quality group have a wiki? I'm thinking that we list the areas > to test and how to test them there and then have both Jigsaw and Adoption > groups link to that material, we can probably use the Adoption GitHub group > to build any code tutorials (like with lambdas and date and time). > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 31 October 2014 08:30, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > >> Thanks Martijn, >> >> Will let you all know when the EA builds become available, your help with >> testing these >> builds will be much appreciated. >> >> Rgds,Rory >> On 30/10/2014 17:33, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: >>> Date: 30 October 2014 17:30 >>> Subject: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted >>> To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net >>> >>> >>> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 -- Modular Run-Time Images >>> >>> This JEP will soon be proposed for JDK 9. Please direct questions >>> and comments to the jigsaw-dev list. >>> >>> - Mark >>> >> >> -- >> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >> Quality Engineering Manager >> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >> >> > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Fri Oct 31 09:38:15 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:38:15 +0000 Subject: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted In-Reply-To: References: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> <54534892.9040005@oracle.com> <545351D6.9090009@oracle.com> Message-ID: <54535887.9050202@oracle.com> On 31/10/2014 09:20, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Rory, > > Ah, there's the link! Quick note that there's no (obvious?) link from > your Group page on openjdk.java.net to the > wiki, might want to add that in. Will do, once the leadership stuff is sorted. > Sounds good on the rest, I think we'll have to cast the net even wider > for 9, I'll have a think about how we can reach the corporations, > perhaps through some JCP outreach. > Sounds good, Martijn. My full list of contacts ~50 FOSS projects, not all wanted to be listed yet :-) Rgds,Rory > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 31 October 2014 09:09, Rory O'Donnell > wrote: > > Hi Martijn, > > We are still working the Quality group lead issue, in the mean > time I will > work with Dalibor on this an come back to you. > > I will ping all the FOSS projects listed on the Quality Outreach > wiki > > asking them to > test their tools, libraries, and applications against these builds > to help tease out > any compatibility issues. > > Rgds,Rory > > On 31/10/2014 08:57, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> Hi Rory, >> >> Does the quality group have a wiki? I'm thinking that we list >> the areas to test and how to test them there and then have both >> Jigsaw and Adoption groups link to that material, we can probably >> use the Adoption GitHub group to build any code tutorials (like >> with lambdas and date and time). >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 31 October 2014 08:30, Rory O'Donnell >> > wrote: >> >> Thanks Martijn, >> >> Will let you all know when the EA builds become available, >> your help with testing these >> builds will be much appreciated. >> >> Rgds,Rory >> On 30/10/2014 17:33, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: > > >> Date: 30 October 2014 17:30 >> Subject: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted >> To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net >> >> >> >> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 -- Modular Run-Time Images >> >> This JEP will soon be proposed for JDK 9. Please direct >> questions >> and comments to the jigsaw-dev list. >> >> - Mark >> >> >> -- >> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >> Quality Engineering Manager >> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >> >> > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Fri Oct 31 10:20:14 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:20:14 +0000 Subject: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted In-Reply-To: <027801cff4f0$809599d0$81c0cd70$@apache.org> References: <20141030103020.482306@eggemoggin.niobe.net> <54534892.9040005@oracle.com> <545351D6.9090009@oracle.com> <027801cff4f0$809599d0$81c0cd70$@apache.org> Message-ID: <5453625E.10300@oracle.com> On 31/10/2014 09:53, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi Rory, > > I already opened an issue for forbidden-apis checker: > https://code.google.com/p/forbidden-apis/issues/detail?id=39 > Thanks Uwe. > > In Lucene we have no traversal of bootclasspath (we only inspect our > application classpath in tests to enumerate test classes, which will > not change by the JEP). > > In general, I expect projects like Apache Ant and Apache Maven to have > problems with the new classpath layout, because they all rely on stuff > like rt.jar available. The main problem (from the perspective of a > tools developer) is the fact that Classloader has no possibility to > list all resources/classes from a specific Java package. This is still > not addressed in the JEP (it is party by the new FilesystemProvider > for jrt:/ URLs), but there is no generic way for tools to list classes > or resources. You always need some knowledge about the structure of > your classpath, which is bad! Something like > ClassLoader#getClassesInPackage() or ClassLoader#getResourcesInPackage > and ClassLoader.listPackages() is needed (my personal opinion). > Alternatively a very general FileSystemProvider for the whole > Classpath not just the runtime packages would be cool. > > Interestingly, in the new issue of the German Java Magazin, Arno Haase > wrote an article about traversing the classpath? > > One big problem is also that some parts of the new infrastructure also > need the tools be compiled against newer JDKs (because Filesystem API > is only available with Java 7), but Tools like Apache Ant or Maven are > still comiled against JDK5 for compatibility reasons. For those > projects its hard to make use of the filesystem providers, so they > need to update or use some ?shim? classes if they detect a new JDK > version. > Uwe - could you send you requests to jigsaw-dev at openjdk.java.net? Many thanks, Rory > Uwe > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > uschindler at apache.org > > Apache Lucene PMC Member / Committer > > Bremen, Germany > > http://lucene.apache.org/ > > *From:*quality-discuss > [mailto:quality-discuss-bounces at openjdk.java.net] *On Behalf Of *Rory > O'Donnell > *Sent:* Friday, October 31, 2014 10:10 AM > *To:* Martijn Verburg > *Cc:* quality-discuss at openjdk.java.net; adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net > *Subject:* Re: Fwd: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted > > Hi Martijn, > > We are still working the Quality group lead issue, in the mean time I > will > work with Dalibor on this an come back to you. > > I will ping all the FOSS projects listed on the Quality Outreach wiki > > asking them to > test their tools, libraries, and applications against these builds to > help tease out > any compatibility issues. > > Rgds,Rory > > On 31/10/2014 08:57, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi Rory, > > Does the quality group have a wiki? I'm thinking that we list the > areas to test and how to test them there and then have both Jigsaw > and Adoption groups link to that material, we can probably use the > Adoption GitHub group to build any code tutorials (like with > lambdas and date and time). > > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 31 October 2014 08:30, Rory O'Donnell > wrote: > > Thanks Martijn, > > Will let you all know when the EA builds become available, your > help with testing these > builds will be much appreciated. > > Rgds,Rory > On 30/10/2014 17:33, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Cheers, > Martijn > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: > > Date: 30 October 2014 17:30 > Subject: FYI: Next Jigsaw JEP posted > To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net > > > http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 -- Modular Run-Time Images > > This JEP will soon be proposed for JDK 9. Please direct questions > and comments to the jigsaw-dev list. > > - Mark > > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland