Yuri Nesterenko Yuri.Nesterenko at Sun.COM
Fri May 16 00:58:04 PDT 2008

Actually, there's nothing to clena in documentation. Motif just isn't 
mentioned anywhere anymore. Or is it? http://openjdk.java.net seems also 

PEOPLE! If someone has up-to-date document with motif
requirements or something to that effect, (it's not up-to-date document) 
please let me know.


Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
> So, we only need to clean our documentation?  Am I right?  If so a CR 
> should be fired about this (or we can do this w/o cr?).
> Oleg.
> Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>> Hi Oleg,
>> after 6463431 (integrated in b21) there's no such a check any more nor 
>> any stated requirement in readme files. I've double-checked it in make 
>> hierarchy, and the only motif-related stuff is Motif L&F and some 
>> deadend vestiges, never included anywhere.
>> Thanks,
>> -yan
>> Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
>>> Yuri,
>>> could you, please, file a CR to remove this check.
>>> Thanks, Oleg.
>>> Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>>>> Phil Race wrote:
>>>>> Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
>>>>>>> Ok, good to know. I wonder why OpenMotif or lesstif is required 
>>>>>>> to build
>>>>>>> OpenJDK then?
>>>>>> I think we need headers to get some constants, but perhaps we 
>>>>>> forgot to remove the check ;)  We will look at this.
>>>>> Yes, its just headers for constants for window manager 
>>>>> interoperability.
>>>>> I believe its possible to do away with this but it was more 
>>>>> work/risk than Yuri had time for
>>>>> when he was removing the main motif build dependencies from openjdk.
>>>>> -phil.
>>>> AFAIK Motif headers are not necessary any more for jdk7 (see 6463431),
>>>> and there should be no reference in building documents or scripts to 
>>>> anything Motif. There is plenty of dead spaghetty left in the code, 
>>>> though, mostly harmless.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -yan

More information about the awt-dev mailing list