<AWT Dev> [8] Review request for 6847588: AWT test fails

Sergey Bylokhov Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com
Tue Jun 11 06:49:28 PDT 2013


On 11.06.2013 17:21, Anthony Petrov wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 03:31 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> On 11.06.2013 15:04, Anthony Petrov wrote:
> I don't see how "TTP is widely used." Here's what I actually see:
>
> $ grep -r targetToPeer src/* | wc -l
> 31
> $ grep -r getPeer src/* | grep awt | wc -l
> 345
and only 17 use accessor.
>
> Looks like a bit opposite to me.
>
> My main point is that TTP is unnecessarily inefficient for general use 
> because it involves too much locking. That's why I'm suggesting to 
> prefer the AWTAccessor.getPeer() instead. However, we can't just 
> remove the TTP because it's useful for special cases mentioned by you 
> (TrayIcon, menus, etc.). Also, I don't think we should change the 
> AWTAccessor.getPeer() to handle these special cases because it may 
> slow it down. I think that both methods are useful for their purposes 
> and should stay as they are. The only thing that needs to be evaluated 
> is whether direct calls to Component.getPeer() should be replaced with 
> the AWTAccessor version or not. This may not be always required actually.
if you care of performance, it is possible speedup TTP, if to implement 
it via accessor for Components subclasses.
>
> -- 
> best regards,
> Anthony
>
>
>>> But that's something to be considered under a separate CR.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> best regards,
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>> On 06/11/2013 02:53 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>> On 11.06.2013 14:01, Anthony Petrov wrote:
>>>>> Anton: Your fix looks fine to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sergey: I grepped our code for targetToPeer and getPeer and I see a
>>>>> lot more usages of the latter than the former. Could you please
>>>>> explain why using the targetToPeer is a correct way in this case? 
>>>>> As I
>>>>> see it, it involves taking at least two locks in the AWTAutoShutdown
>>>>> code, and hence it seems kind of slow. Why would we prefer it over a
>>>>> direct call to (AWTAccessor.)getPeer?
>>>> The difference is that SunToolkit.targetToPeer() works for trayIcon,
>>>> Menu, MenuBar, MenuItem. So to make life easier I suggest 
>>>> everywhere use
>>>> targetToPeer. And probably it is good idea to remove getPeer from
>>>> AWTAccessor(17 usage in the jdk)
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> best regards,
>>>>> Anthony
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/10/2013 07:30 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, Anton.
>>>>>> I suppose the correct way to get peer from the component is to use
>>>>>> (X/LWC)SunToolkit.targetToPeer() if possible.see latest version of
>>>>>> LWKeyboardFocusManagerPeer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10.06.2013 17:03, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please review the following fix for the bug CR 6847588 which 
>>>>>>> consists
>>>>>>> in calling of an improper implementation of the method
>>>>>>> "java.awt.Component.getPeer" in the class
>>>>>>> "sun.awt.X11.XKeyboardFocusManagerPeer".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/6847588/webrev.00
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Anton
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>


-- 
Best regards, Sergey.



More information about the awt-dev mailing list