<AWT Dev> RfR JDK-8076552 nightly build break fix

Mandy Chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Wed Apr 8 17:47:15 UTC 2015

I agree with Phil's suggestion and file a bug to follow up the javadoc 
build issue.

You can verify the result from make docs that there is no javadoc 
generated for this package on windows build.


On 4/8/2015 10:29 AM, Phil Race wrote:
> Isn't it sufficient to comment out this one line ?
> 1215 ALL_OTHER_TARGETS += jaccessdocs
> .. and add a comment as to why ?
> -phil.
> On 04/08/2015 10:25 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Here is an updated patch.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.02/
>> It simply removes the com.sun.java.accessibility.util part of the
>> javadoc generation.
>> How to better deal with the javadoc generation can be left to later.
>> Please let me know if this patch meets with your approval.
>> I have started a local Win build and will start JPRT builds on Linux,
>> Windows, Solaris, and Mac shortly.
>> Thanks,
>> Pete
>> On 4/8/15 12:51 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> Please review/approve the following patch.
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.01/
>>> The recent push for JDK-8076182 caused a build break, i.e. a problem 
>>> for
>>> the creation of the Javadoc in the environment used by the nightly
>>> build.  This was because a newly opened package
>>> com.sun.java.accessibility.util was mistakenly located in a windows
>>> directory.  This patch moves the package's files from
>>> jdk/src/windows/classes to jdk/src/share/classes and this should 
>>> resolve
>>> the build break for the jdk8u-dev nightly.
>>> JPRT builds run OK on solaris, mac, and linux.  As of this writing the
>>> Win jobs haven't started yet but the 64 bit build completed OK on my
>>> local machine.
>>> This patch also had to include the fix for JDK-8051297 "Remove
>>> com.sun.java.accessibility.util.java.awt.ChoiceTranslator". That file
>>> is dead code and its existence in jdk/src/share/classes causes a
>>> compilation failure, access of a non-existent enum, the reason the file
>>> was planned to be removed.
>>> Thanks, Pete

More information about the awt-dev mailing list