<AWT Dev> [9] RFR for 8150724: [TEST] HiDPI: create a test for multiresolution icons

[Alexander Stepanov]

They are used for the further coordinates obtaining (on OS X the icon 
sizes are not equal for the buttons and the tabbed pane - please see the 
screenshot attached to JDK-8151060):

Please see lines 187-189:

  187         Component tc = tabbedPane.getTabComponentAt(1);
  188         x = tc.getLocationOnScreen().x + tc.getWidth() / 2;
  189         c = r.getPixelColor(x, y);

It seems to be a quite reliable way to get the proper x coordinate value 
here instead of guessing. (we do not need that for Linux and Win.)

Regards,
Alexander

On 3/9/2016 6:59 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Can you please clarify these lines:
>  117         tabbedPane.addTab("", new JPanel());
>  118         tabbedPane.setTabComponentAt(1, new JLabel());
>
> On 09.03.16 18:48, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>> Hello, Sergey,
>>
>> Please see the updated version of the test:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.02/
>>
>> (covers JDK-8151303 as well).
>>
>>  > I suggest to add these lines to the test instead of replace the old
>> lines
>> done.
>>
>> please see "@requires tag" - for now it will stop test run on OS X.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexander
>>
>> On 3/4/2016 7:08 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>>> The test should be updated to cover the related issue
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151303
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alexander
>>>
>>> On 3/4/2016 1:15 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>>>> Hello, Sergey,
>>>>
>>>> We have JLabel(icon) already in the test, and we cannot have both
>>>> these cases at the same tab. Moreover, we can in principle use some
>>>> other components as an argument of 'setTabComponentAt', but I'm not
>>>> sure that these cases have some novelty.
>>>>
>>>> So my suggestion is to  can simply return to the old version of the
>>>> test (which will fail on OS X) or add it commented with some "TODO:
>>>> uncomment / replace after 8151060 fix" instruction in code.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alexander
>>>>
>>>> On 3/4/2016 1:21 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>> Hi, Alexander.
>>>>> I suggest to add these lines to the test instead of replace the old
>>>>> lines. The test will pass after the fix for 8151060.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03.03.16 17:45, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>>>>>> Could you please review the updated version of the test?
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.01
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Line
>>>>>>   106         tabbedPane.addTab("", icon, p);
>>>>>> was replaced with
>>>>>>   109         tabbedPane.addTab("", p);
>>>>>>   110         tabbedPane.setTabComponentAt(0, new JLabel(icon));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - in such a case the test passes for OS X (as well as for Windows,
>>>>>> Linux).
>>>>>> Probably these changes should be reverted after JDK-8151060 fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Alexander
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/2/2016 7:15 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello Sergey,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It fails because of
>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151060
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (plus we need here some tricky check for resolution by the analogy
>>>>>>> with 8150258 because of JDK-8150844).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Alexander
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/26/2016 4:25 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi, Alexander.
>>>>>>>> The test failed on osx 10.11 + retina. Is it expected?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26.02.16 15:53, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you please review the following fix
>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.00/
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150724 ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just a single test added.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Alexander
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>