<AWT Dev> [9] Review request for 8154539 Examine the desktop module's use of sun.misc.SoftCache
Alexander Scherbatiy
alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com
Wed May 11 21:55:33 UTC 2016
On 12/05/16 01:50, Phil Race wrote:
> Alexander ... I am concurrently deleting GThreadHelper (see webrev I
> just sent out)
> which is covered by a separate bug so please revert that part of the
> fix.
Sorry. Here is the updated fix where only SoftCache is moved to the
java.desktop module and the test ReferrersTest is updated.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8154539/webrev.02/
Thanks,
Alexandr.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 5/11/2016 2:43 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could you review the updated fix:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8154539/webrev.01
>>
>> - The test/com/sun/jdi/ReferrersTest.java test is updated to use
>> sun.awt.SoftCache
>> - The sun.misc.GThreadHelper class is moved to the sun.awt package
>> in the java.desktop module
>>
>> The jdk.unsupported dependency was removed from the
>> src/java.desktop/share/classes/module-info.java file.
>> The sun.misc.GThreadHelper class is called by JNI and may be it
>> does not require the declared dependency to the jdk.unsupported
>> module. In any case it seems better to move the GThreadHelper class
>> to the java.desktop module.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexandr.
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/16 00:15, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>>> On May 11, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy
>>>> <alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Could you review the fix:
>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154539
>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8154539/webrev.00
>>>>
>>>> This is a request from the jigsaw team to get rid of the
>>>> dependency to jdk.unsupported module from the java.desktop module.
>>>> The fix moves the sun.misc.SoftCache class to the sun.awt package
>>>> in the java.desktop module.
>>> Looks okay. Moving sun.misc.SoftCache to java.desktop is fine.
>>>
>>> test/com/sun/jdi/ReferrersTest.java references sun.misc.SoftCache.
>>> I don’t know whether this test finds sun.misc.SoftCache in the
>>> reference graph at all. I suggest to update the test to check
>>> “sun.awt.SoftCache” instead and file a bug to the serviceability to
>>> follow up if that check is needed or not.
>>>
>>> Mandy
>>
>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list