<AWT Dev> RFR [13] 8227919: 8213232 causes crashes on solaris sparc64

Vladimir Kempik vkempik at azul.com
Fri Jul 26 12:59:59 UTC 2019


Hello

what still bothers me is this:

The first Big Endian block:

1629 #if defined(_LP64) && !defined(_LITTLE_ENDIAN)
1630         // On 64bit BigEndian,
1631         // Window value may be stored on high 32bit by XGetICValues via XIM
1632         if (w > 0xffffffffL) w = w >> 32;
1633 #endif

is inside linux&macos block

1622 #if defined(__linux__) || defined(MACOSX)

however the second Big Endian block is for every platform:

1698 #if defined(_LP64) && !defined(_LITTLE_ENDIAN)
1699     // On 64bit BigEndian,
1700     // XIMPreeditState value may be stored on high 32bit by XGetICValues via XIM
1701     if (state > 0xffffffffL) state = state >> 32;
1702 #endif
I’m not sure if it’s ok or not.

Also, since XIMPreeditState is unsigned 64-bit int, I think we need to compare it against 0xffffffffUL instead of 0xffffffffL

typedef unsigned long int XIMPreeditState;


Thanks, Vladimir

> 26 июля 2019 г., в 15:53, Ichiroh Takiguchi <takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> написал(а):
> 
> Hello.
> 
> Could you review the fix ?
> 
> Bug:    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227919
> Change: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~itakiguchi/8227919/webrev.00/
> 
> It's crash issue for Solaris SPARC platform.
> If possible, please push this fix into 13.
> 
> XIMPreditState is changed to unsigned long instead of unsigned int on 64bit Big endian.
> It's same as Java8.
> I think Solaris SPARC's issue can be fixed by this fix.
> 
> Vladimir,
> I appreciate your great help.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ichiroh Takiguchi
> IBM Japan, Ltd.
> 
> On 2019-07-23 20:00, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
>> Hello
>> it still crashes with  "Bus Error"
>> I guess I may miss something on X server side.
>> Thanks, Vladimir.
>>> 22 июля 2019 г., в 21:08, Ichiroh Takiguchi <takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> написал(а):
>>> Hello Vladimir.
>>> I really appreciate your help.
>>> "XMODIFIERS=@im=local" is related Multi key Compose feature [1]
>>> One of document said "XMODIFIERS=@im=none" [2]
>>> Could you try "XMODIFIERS=@im=none" ?
>>> [1] https://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/man/man5/Compose.5.xhtml <https://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/man/man5/Compose.5.xhtml>
>>> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/InputMethods <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/InputMethods>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ichiroh Takiguchi
>>> On 2019-07-22 23:58, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>> I’m getting Bus Error on startup with
>>>> XMODIFIERS=@im=local ./xim_root
>>>> nothing yet in log at that moment.
>>>> Thanks, Vladimir
>>>>> 22 июля 2019 г., в 15:12, Ichiroh Takiguchi <takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> написал(а):
>>>>> Hello Vladimir.
>>>>> I appreciate your reply.
>>>>> I did not expect "[1]w=0x0", it means xim_root could not receive focus window via XIC.
>>>>> I checked ibus XIM server on Linux s390x platform again, it also returned "[1]w=0" ...
>>>>> I was confused.
>>>>> I'd like to add new instruction
>>>>> 5. Run xim_root with XMODIFIERS=@im=local environment variable on desktop, like
>>>>> $ XMODIFIERS=@im=local ./xim_root
>>>>> 6. Move input focus to XIM demo window
>>>>> 7. Press Ctrl key and Press Right mouse button
>>>>> I tested xim_root on Linux s390x platform.
>>>>> $ XMODIFIERS=@im=ibus ./xim_root
>>>>> fevent = 0x3
>>>>> topwindow = 0x1e00001, window = 0x1e00002
>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>> WM_TAKE_FOCUS is received, window=0x1e00002, timestamp=1470262945
>>>>> XSetInputFocus() is called
>>>>> FocusOut: window=0x1e00002(Internal Window)
>>>>> XUnsetICFocus
>>>>> FocusOut: window=0x1e00001(XIM demo - root-im window - 64bit)
>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x1e00001(XIM demo - root-im window - 64bit)
>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x1e00002(Internal Window)
>>>>> XSetICFocus
>>>>> KeyPress:
>>>>> ButtonPress:
>>>>> [1]w=0x0
>>>>> [2]w=0x0
>>>>> [1]state=0x0
>>>>> [2]state=0x0
>>>>> State: Unknown
>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>> I tried it with XMODIFIERS=@im=local
>>>>> $ XMODIFIERS=@im=local ./xim_root
>>>>> fevent = 0
>>>>> topwindow = 0x2000001, window = 0x2000002
>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>> WM_TAKE_FOCUS is received, window=0x2000002, timestamp=1470356372
>>>>> XSetInputFocus() is called
>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x2000001(XIM demo - root-im window - 64bit)
>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x2000002(Internal Window)
>>>>> XSetICFocus
>>>>> KeyPress:
>>>>> ButtonPress:
>>>>> [1]w=0x2000002
>>>>> [2]w=0x2000002
>>>>> [1]state=0x2
>>>>> [2]state=0x2
>>>>> State: IM Off
>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>> I was expected this result.
>>>>> $ XMODIFIERS=@im=kinput2 ./xim_root
>>>>> fevent = 0x3
>>>>> topwindow = 0x2000001, window = 0x2000002
>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>> WM_TAKE_FOCUS is received, window=0x2000002, timestamp=1470386128
>>>>> XSetInputFocus() is called
>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x2000001(XIM demo - root-im window - 64bit)
>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x2000002(Internal Window)
>>>>> XSetICFocus
>>>>> KeyPress:
>>>>> ButtonPress:
>>>>> [1]w=0x200000200000000
>>>>> [2]w=0x2000002
>>>>> [1]state=0x200000000
>>>>> [2]state=0x2
>>>>> State: IM Off
>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>> I'm sorry, it seemed current code did not work on even if Linux s390x platform.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ichiroh Takiguchi
>>>>> On 2019-07-19 23:29, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>> I’m probably missing something about XIM on X side here, using ssh
>>>>>> -X from ubuntu(with Xserver) to solaris11 sparc64 machine
>>>>>> the output is
>>>>>> fevent = 0x3
>>>>>> topwindow = 0x3800001, window = 0x3800002
>>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>>> WM_TAKE_FOCUS is received, window=0x3800002, timestamp=3262503
>>>>>> XSetInputFocus() is called
>>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x3800001(XIM demo - root-im window - 64bit)
>>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x3800002(Internal Window)
>>>>>> XSetICFocus
>>>>>> FocusOut: window=0x3800002(Internal Window)
>>>>>> XUnsetICFocus
>>>>>> FocusOut: window=0x3800001(XIM demo - root-im window - 64bit)
>>>>>> ClientMessage is received
>>>>>> WM_TAKE_FOCUS is received, window=0x3800002, timestamp=3267238
>>>>>> XSetInputFocus() is called
>>>>>> ButtonPress:
>>>>>> [1]w=0x0
>>>>>> [2]w=0x0
>>>>>> [1]state=0x0
>>>>>> [2]state=0x0
>>>>>> State: Unknown
>>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x3800001(XIM demo - root-im window - 64bit)
>>>>>> FocusIn: window=0x3800002(Internal Window)
>>>>>> I also had to press left button, not right one.
>>>>>> I think when you initialy created 8213232 you were targeting linux
>>>>>> ppc64 BE system in your patch and simply forgot about another 64-bit
>>>>>> BE system - solaris sparc64
>>>>>> I would propose this fix for 8227919
>>>>>> --- a/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_InputMethod.c
>>>>>> +++ b/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_InputMethod.c
>>>>>> @@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>   X11InputMethodData *pX11IMData = NULL;
>>>>>>   char * ret = NULL;
>>>>>> -#if defined(_LP64) && !defined(_LITTLE_ENDIAN)
>>>>>> +#if defined(__linux__) && defined(_LP64) && !defined(_LITTLE_ENDIAN)
>>>>>>   // XIMPreeditState value which is used for XGetICValues must be
>>>>>> 32bit on BigEndian XOrg's xlib
>>>>>>   unsigned int state = XIMPreeditUnKnown;
>>>>>> #else
>>>>>> Such change already allowed to pass our internal tests on solaris sparc64
>>>>>> if you think it’s ok then let me take over and finish with 8227919
>>>>>> Thanks, Vladimir
>>>>>> 19 июля 2019 г., в 16:57, Ichiroh Takiguchi
>>>>>> <takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> <mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>><mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com><mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>>>>
>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>> I need Solaris 64bit SPARC desktop user volunteer for jdk-8227919 [1]
>>>>>> Please follow the steps:
>>>>>> 1. Download xim_root.c [2] and compile it on Solaris 64bit SPARC
>>>>>> 2. Run xim_root on desktop
>>>>>> 3. Move input focus to XIM demo window
>>>>>> 4. Press Ctrl key and Press Right mouse button
>>>>>> Please put the output into JDK-8227919 [1] or post it into mailing list.
>>>>>> I really appreciate if you are using XIM like IIIMF.
>>>>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227919
>>>>>> [2] https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~itakiguchi/8227919/xim_root.c
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Ichiroh Takiguchi

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/attachments/20190726/f6c90ca1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/attachments/20190726/f6c90ca1/signature-0001.asc>


More information about the awt-dev mailing list