<AWT Dev> RFR: 8266459: Implement JEP 411: Deprecate the Security Manager for Removal
alanb at openjdk.java.net
Tue May 18 06:33:40 UTC 2021
On Mon, 17 May 2021 18:23:41 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Please review this implementation of [JEP 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411).
> The code change is divided into 3 commits. Please review them one by one.
> 1. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/576161d15423f58281e384174d28c9f9be7941a1 The essential change for this JEP, including the `@Deprecate` annotations and spec change. It also update the default value of the `java.security.manager` system property to "disallow", and necessary test change following this update.
> 2. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/26a54a835e9f84aa528740a7c5c35d07355a8a66 Manual changes to several files so that the next commit can be generated programatically.
> 3. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/eb6c566ff9207974a03a53335e0e697cffcf0950 Automatic changes to other source files to avoid javac warnings on deprecation for removal
> The 1st and 2nd commits should be reviewed carefully. The 3rd one is generated programmatically, see the comment below for more details. If you are only interested in a portion of the 3rd commit and would like to review it as a separate file, please comment here and I'll generate an individual webrev.
> Due to the size of this PR, no attempt is made to update copyright years for any file to minimize unnecessary merge conflict.
> Furthermore, since the default value of `java.security.manager` system property is now "disallow", most of the tests calling `System.setSecurityManager()` need to launched with `-Djava.security.manager=allow`. This is covered in a different PR at https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/4071.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/SecurityManager.java line 315:
> 313: *
> 314: * @since 1.0
> 315: * @deprecated The Security Manager is deprecated and subject to removal in a
Javadoc will prefix, in bold, "Deprecated, for removal: This API element is subject to removal in a future version". I'm just wondering if the sentence will be repeated here, can you check?
More information about the awt-dev