From anton.litvinov at oracle.com Wed May 21 15:29:24 2014 From: anton.litvinov at oracle.com (Anton Litvinov) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 19:29:24 +0400 Subject: [7u] Review request for 7172865: PropertyDescriptor fails to work with setter method name if setter is non-void Message-ID: <537CC654.2010406@oracle.com> Hello Sergey and Alexander, Could you please review this backport of the fix, which you created and reviewed for JDK 8, from JDK 8 to JDK 7. The backport fix is identical to the original fix. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7172865 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/7172865/jdk7/webrev.00 JDK 8 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/2ad01ecbaf90 Thank you, Anton From sergey.malenkov at oracle.com Thu May 22 10:13:10 2014 From: sergey.malenkov at oracle.com (sergey malenkov) Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:13:10 +0400 Subject: Approved: [7u] Review request for 7172865: PropertyDescriptor fails to work with setter method name if setter is non-void In-Reply-To: <537CC654.2010406@oracle.com> References: <537CC654.2010406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <537DCDB6.4070602@oracle.com> Hi Anton, The backport is similar to the original fix. I approve. Thanks, SAM On 21.05.2014 19:29, Anton Litvinov wrote: > Hello Sergey and Alexander, > > Could you please review this backport of the fix, which you created > and reviewed for JDK 8, from JDK 8 to JDK 7. The backport fix is > identical to the original fix. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7172865 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/7172865/jdk7/webrev.00 > JDK 8 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/2ad01ecbaf90 > > Thank you, > Anton From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Thu May 22 10:23:21 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:23:21 +0400 Subject: [7u] Review request for 7172865: PropertyDescriptor fails to work with setter method name if setter is non-void In-Reply-To: <537CC654.2010406@oracle.com> References: <537CC654.2010406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <537DD019.7070403@oracle.com> The backport looks good for me. Thanks, Alexandr. On 5/21/2014 7:29 PM, Anton Litvinov wrote: > Hello Sergey and Alexander, > > Could you please review this backport of the fix, which you created > and reviewed for JDK 8, from JDK 8 to JDK 7. The backport fix is > identical to the original fix. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7172865 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/7172865/jdk7/webrev.00 > JDK 8 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/2ad01ecbaf90 > > Thank you, > Anton From joe.darcy at oracle.com Fri May 30 03:12:57 2014 From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (Joe Darcy) Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 20:12:57 -0700 Subject: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8042860 : Fix raw and unchecked warnings in java.beans Message-ID: <5387F739.2000802@oracle.com> Hello, Please review this draft fix for JDK-8042860 : Fix raw and unchecked warnings in java.beans http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8042860.0/ Note that I did not try to generify the java.util.Collection methods in BeanContextSupport. Thanks, -Joe From sergey.malenkov at oracle.com Fri May 30 08:45:42 2014 From: sergey.malenkov at oracle.com (sergey malenkov) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 12:45:42 +0400 Subject: Approved: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8042860 : Fix raw and unchecked warnings in java.beans In-Reply-To: <5387F739.2000802@oracle.com> References: <5387F739.2000802@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53884536.6050000@oracle.com> The fix is good to me. SAM On 30.05.2014 7:12, Joe Darcy wrote: > Hello, > > Please review this draft fix for > > JDK-8042860 : Fix raw and unchecked warnings in java.beans > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8042860.0/ > > Note that I did not try to generify the java.util.Collection methods > in BeanContextSupport. > > Thanks, > > -Joe From sergey.malenkov at oracle.com Fri May 30 16:36:50 2014 From: sergey.malenkov at oracle.com (sergey malenkov) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 20:36:50 +0400 Subject: [9] RFR 7084904: Introspector returns isX() from base package-private class that throws exception Message-ID: <5388B3A2.9080002@oracle.com> Hello, Could you please review the following fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/7084904.9.0/ http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7084904 Add useful test. Thanks, SAM