JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Mon Nov 18 10:03:29 UTC 2013


On 2013-11-15 16:32, Dave Pointon wrote:
> Hi all ,
>
> Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I
> would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps.
>
> I believe, as I said in the bug, that this would lead to an overall
> improvement in the usability - especially for the newbie user/builder
> such as myself.
>
> PFA a webrev for your perusal - the diff can also be found in the above
> bug.

Thank you for your help!

Please note that attachments sent to the list is (often, always?) 
stripped. If you wish to provide a webrev, it is better to put it on a 
web server and send a link. In this case it didn't matter, the patch was 
available in the bug report and simple enough to not require a full webrev.

The only remaining steps is legal and administrative. :) As I understand 
it, you or your company needs to have signed the OCA. I do believe IBM 
have done that (but I'm not sure how I would go about to check it) so 
it's probably only a formality.

After that, there are no more steps for you. We'll take care of your 
patch and submit it to a proper release. (At this time, it's not likely 
that it will make it to JDK8.)

/Magnus



More information about the build-dev mailing list