RFR: 8214796: Create a jlink plugin for stripping debug info symbols from native libraries

Erik Joelsson erik.joelsson at oracle.com
Fri Feb 8 01:01:04 UTC 2019


On 2019-02-07 11:09, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 09:39 -0800, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Hello Severin,
>>
>> There is a macro for automatically finding all source dirs for a module.
>> So in Gensrc-jdk.jlink.gmk, I think it would be better expressed using
>> that macro, like this:
>>
>> JLINK_RESOURCE_DIRS := $(wildcard $(addsuffix
>> /jdk/tools/jlink/resources, $(call FindModuleSrcSdirs, jdk.jlink)))
>>
>> The above could/should even be inlined.
> I've considered this. It seems, though, that FindModuleSrcDirs comes
> from make/common/Modules.gmk which isn't included in
> make/gensrc/Gensrc-jdk.jlink.gmk. Given that it has already caused
> problems with multiple includes of Modules.gmk (JDK-8213736) I was
> reluctant to include it here too. Without the new include the above
> won't work.
>
> The approach I've taken here seems to be the lesser evil. Thoughts?

I appreciate your concern, but JDK-8213736 was a problem in Main.gmk, 
which is part of where Modules.gmk gets bootstrapped. In any normal 
makefile (as in where stuff is just being built), the bootstrapping is 
done and including Modules.gmk is completely fine. Any 
<phase>-<module>.gmk file certainly qualifies here.

/Erik

> Thanks,
> Severin
>
>> Otherwise build changes look ok.
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>> On 2019-02-07 09:09, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could I please get reviews for this enhancement? It adds a debug
>>> symbols stripping plug-in to jlink for Linux and Unix platforms. It's
>>> the first platform specific jlink plugin and the approach taken for
>>> keeping it contained is to use a plugin specific ResourceBundle.
>>> Discussion for this happened in [1].
>>>
>>> The test uses a native library which should never get debug symbols
>>> stripped during the test library build. As such, tiny modifications
>>> were needed to make/common/TestFilesCompilation.gmk. Hence, build-dev
>>> being on the list for this RFR. The test currently only runs on Linux
>>> and requires objcopy to be available. Otherwise the test is being
>>> skipped.
>>>
>>> Example usage of this plugin is described in the bug.
>>>
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8214796/04/webrev/
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214796
>>>
>>> Testing: test/jdk/tools/jlink test/jdk/jdk/modules tests on Linux
>>> x86_64 (with good and broken objcopy) and the newly added test. It's
>>> currently running through jdk/submit too.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Severin
>>>
>>> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2019-January/014109.html
>>>


More information about the build-dev mailing list