For further consideration...

[Joseph D. Darcy]

David Goodenough wrote:
> On Monday 30 March 2009, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>   
>> David Goodenough wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wednesday 25 March 2009, David Goodenough wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Joe Darcy wrote:

[snip]



>>> It is a shame that no-one has seen fit to reply to this note.
>>>       
>> Especially since there has been no other recent traffic on the list to
>> read or respond to!
>>
>> -Joe
>>     
>
> I realise that there have been a lot of new proposals to consider, but
> I am trying to understand what it is that needs to be improved in my
> proposal in order to get it considered.   Without feedback that is very
> difficult.  That is why I asked the questions about, and was dissapointed
> not to get a reply.
>   

When the subject of your proposal is listed as being out of scope before 
the project starts,

    http://blogs.sun.com/darcy/entry/guidance_measure_language_change_size

you should not be surprised when your proposal doesn't move forward.

-Joe