Codereview request for 7183053: Optimize DoubleByte charset for String.getBytes()/new String(byte[])

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Fri Jul 13 12:19:26 UTC 2012


On 11/07/2012 00:11, Xueming Shen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In JDK7,  the decoder and encoder implementation of most of our 
> single-byte charsets
> and UTF-8 charset are optimized to implement the internal interfce 
> sun.nio.cs.ArrayDecoder/
> Encoder to provide a fastpath for String.getBytes(...) and new 
> String(byte[]...) operations. I
> have an old blog regarding this optimization at
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/xuemingshen/entry/faster_new_string_bytes_cs
>
> This rfe, as the followup for above changes, is to implement 
> ArrayDe/Encoder for most
> of the sun.nio.cs.ext.DoubleByte based double-byte charsets. Here is 
> the webrev
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7183053/webrev
I've taken a pass over this and it's great to see 
DoubleByte.Decoder/Encoder implementing sun.nio.cs.ArrayDecoder/Encoder. 
The results looks good too, a small number of regressions (Big5 at 
len=32 for example) but this is a micro benchmark and I'm sure there are 
fluctuations. I don't see anything obviously wrong with the EBCDIC 
changes I'd need a history book to remember how the shifts between DBCS 
and SBCS. I think our tests our good for this area so I'm happy. One 
minor nit is the continue in both encode methods, I think it would be 
cleaner to use "else if (bb ..." instead.

I see in TestStringCoding.java that you've commented out the test that 
goes over the buffer limit - would I be correct to say that this isn't 
an issue and this happens with DB charsets today?

Ulf - you've got several patches to the double byte charsets and I 
wonder if you have cycles to try Sherman's patch with jdk8 to see if 
there is any more to be gained?

-Alan.




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list