Bug in Long.parseUnsignedLong

Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhalter at oracle.com
Tue Dec 24 21:30:21 UTC 2013

Thanks for the clarification. It looks good to me.

Does anyone have any comments on the various competing proposed fixes? As for me, I like this one with int operations and no cache.



On Dec 23, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:

> We have
> first/0x1p57 - 1 < JAVA{first>>>57} && JAVA{first>>>57} <= first/0x1p57.
> […]
> Hence overflow is detected correctly in this case too.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list