Review request for 8009115: jtreg tests under jdk/test/javax/script should use nashorn as script engine

A. Sundararajan sundararajan.athijegannathan at
Wed Feb 27 11:20:08 UTC 2013

Thanks Alan. Yes, nashorn is a "js" engine as well and so user's java 
code can use getEngineByName("js") and get it. The current change is to 
make sure that javax.script tests use nashorn engine - rather than any 
other "js" engine that may be present in the underlying jdk.


On Wednesday 27 February 2013 04:47 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 27/02/2013 10:44, A. Sundararajan wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Please review
>> Changing javax.script tests to use nashorn engine explicitly. 
>> Adjusted tests for differences b/w nashorn and rhino engines.
>> Changes documented here: 
>> Thanks
>> -Sundar
> These changes look okay to me although I assumed that Nashorn would be 
> a "js" scripting engine, in which case there shouldn't be a need to 
> change many of the getEngineByName("js") usages to "nashorn".
> -Alan

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list