[9] Review request : JDK-6933879: URISyntaxException when non-alphanumeric characters are present in scope_id

[Konstantin Shefov]

Hi Chris, Alan, thank you for reviewing.

I have made a new webrev 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/6933879/webrev.01
I have removed ":" and added a test case.

-Konstantin

16.01.2015 14:42, Chris Hegarty пишет:
> On 16/01/15 11:29, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 16/01/2015 10:49, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> :
>>>
>>> I don't see any reason to update the spec here, given that the set of
>>> allowable character is not clearly defined in the relevant RFC's.
>>>
>> I think we need to create a bug to look into this more. Inet6Address
>> allows the scope of be any String but URI puts restrictions on what is
>> legal. The proposed change updates the list of allowed characters but I
>> assume it will need to re-visited again as systems with more exotic
>> interface names are encountered.
>
> Yes that is possible, but to date this is the first time I've seen 
> this come up.
>
> Given the lack of clear specification in the relevant RFC's (relating 
> to scope ids ), I don't think we should be making too many 
> specification changes in this area. But I agree with your comment, URI 
> has a restriction that it not clearly specified in the Java spec.
>
> -Chris.