String.indexOf optimization

[Zoltan Sziladi]

Hi Martin,

Nice catches on the cleanup!

By the way, can you tell me why you used named loops in your code? Isn't it
considered bad practice as it is almost like a goto statement? Couldn't we
refactor it in a way that we do not use named loops?

Also, if there is a for loop that has no start statement and no condition
(like this: for (;; i++) ), then is a for loop a good choice for that code?

I'm just wondering, maybe there are some points of view that I'm not
considering...

Regards,
Zoltan

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Vitaly Davidovich <vitalyd at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Try -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:DisableIntrinsic:_indexOf
>>
>
> Thank you very much!  Hard to find because -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal is
> insufficient - also needs  -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions
>