RFR 9: 8152005: sun/misc/SunMiscSignalTest.java failed intermittently
Joseph D. Darcy
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Wed Mar 30 00:54:08 UTC 2016
It wasn't entirely clear to me from the docs if extending the time would
impact the expected running time of the text on an otherwise unloaded
The current version looks fine.
On 3/29/2016 8:24 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> ok, my thought was that extending the time out didn't affect the
> running time of the test
> and since the signal is handled by a separate thread a busy system
> might be the cause.
> I removed the re-raise of the signal so the test will fail if the
> signal is not received
> even after the longer timout.
> Webrev updated in place,
> Thanks, Roger
> On 3/28/2016 8:29 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>> If the test is only rarely failing as-is, I'd prefer to keep the
>> first timeout short and only fallback to the longer timeout in the
>> fallback case.
>> What do you think?
>> On 3/28/2016 11:22 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
>>> Please review this improvement to an intermittently failing test of
>>> The timeout value is increased in case of a busy system and for
>>> debug value the raising of the signal is retried.
>>> Thanks, Roger
More information about the core-libs-dev