Why static_jli for java/javaw on Windows?
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Thu Sep 13 13:32:31 UTC 2018
On 13/09/2018 14:07, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Apparently, someone was trying to get rid of dll dependencies from
> java.exe. Why that would be desirable it does not say. Neither why
> this should not apply to all other launchers. (Perhaps there were not
> that many in these days?)
> Do anyone think this still seems relevant? Otherwise I'd like to get
> rid of this hack, and link java and javaw just like all the other
I don't know if it is still needed but it seems to be related to the
upgrade to VC 7 and an issue related to redistribution issue of the MS
runtime. JDK-6282039 and JDK-6382014 have some info on this.
More information about the core-libs-dev