Michael,<br><br>I think the best way to handle the coordination is in two steps.<br>I'd like to get my Linux-clone changes in first (you should review,<br>I will commit)<br>and then we switch hats and I will review your Solaris changes.<br>
It seems best to do this in two steps: to better place blame when <br>it breaks (this is very tricky stuff to get right).<br>If you agree, please review my posted changes.<br><br>Aside: Instead of griping about the missing execvpe,<br>
I filed a bug against glibc, and was surprised to find<br>that Ulrich Drepper had implemented it a couple of days later.<br>It will probably be in glibc-2.11. Perhaps in 5 years we can<br>use it ourselves...). Thanks, Uli!<br>
<br>Martin<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 07:29, Michael McMahon <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Michael.McMahon@sun.com">Michael.McMahon@sun.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Martin,<br>
<br>
I had done something similar with clone & exec for Linux, but hadn't got round to testing it.<br>
So, it seems reasonable to take yours. Do you want to send me your updated versions of<br>
process_md.c and the test? I can take care of the merge with the Solaris code.</blockquote></div><br>