encumbrances update

Phil Race Phil.Race at Sun.COM
Sat Aug 4 03:59:58 UTC 2007


freetypecheck.c(42) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
'QUO
TEME'

Did it really print a newline in the middle of that name ?

your make/tools/freetypecheck/freetypecheck.c  may be corrupt.

the macro is  defined there  and  its hard to  imagine how it could  be 
affected by anything exernal.

-phil.

Ted Neward wrote:
> OK... Using a private drop of Ivan's freetype build, with an "SVN update" of
> the source base, I get this:
>
> CYGWIN:Ted at XPJAVA:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/make
> $ make sanity
> make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/tools/fre
> etypecheck'
> Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 13.10.3077 for 80x86
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1984-2002. All rights reserved.
>
> freetypecheck.c
> freetypecheck.c(42) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
> 'QUO
> TEME'
> freetypecheck.c(42) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> freetypecheck.c(45) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
> 'QUO
> TEME'
> freetypecheck.c(45) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '&'
> freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before '&'
> freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2059: syntax error : '&'
> freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : ','
> freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '&'
> freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before '&'
> freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : '&'
> freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : ','
> freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before
> 'string'
> freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before
> 'string'
> freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : '<Unknown>'
> freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before
> 'string'
> freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before
> 'string'
> freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2059: syntax error : '<Unknown>'
> freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> freetypecheck.c(54) : error C2059: syntax error : 'if'
> freetypecheck.c(54) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
> 'QUO
> TEME'
> freetypecheck.c(58) : error C2059: syntax error : 'return'
> freetypecheck.c(59) : error C2059: syntax error : '}'
> make[2]: ***
> [c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/tmp/freetype_version
> check] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/tools/free
> typecheck'
> make[1]: [sane-freetype] Error 2 (ignored)
> /bin/sh:
> c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/tmp/freetype_versioncheck
> .exe: No such file or directory
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
>
> Somebody have an idea what's going on here? (Obviously, freetypecheck.c
> isn't building, but I'm not sure why, beyond the obvious "there's a macro
> without enough parameters" as declared on line 42....)
>
> Ted Neward
> Java, .NET, XML Services
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> http://www.tedneward.com
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev-
>> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Igor Nekrestyanov
>> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:39 PM
>> To: Dan Fabulich
>> Cc: discuss at openjdk.java.net; Anthony Petrov; Phil Race; build-
>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: encumbrances update
>>
>>
>>     
>>>> My tests are not "ideal" for number of reasons:
>>>> 2) I was using binary plugs created from my personal workspace.
>>>>      I believe they should be the same as those to be published with
>>>> b17 code drop but this is my assumption.
>>>>         
>>> We know for certain that this assumption is FALSE.  No binary plug
>>> given to the public has ever built successfully on Windows; since your
>>> personal plugs have been working for you for months, we can conclude
>>> that there's something critically different between your plugs and the
>>> plugs we get.
>>>       
>> Prior to introduction of the "binary plugs" in the makefile (starting
>> from the b16)
>> it was easy to use our internal product builds to import encumbered bits
>> for openjdk build.
>> So, internal openjdk builds were easier.
>>
>> However, since b16 we need to export image of binary plugs from the
>> product build and
>> use these exported images for openjdk build.
>> I think (but i am not 100% sure) that same procedure is used to export
>> binary plug bits for people outside of @sun.com.
>> So now there is fewer chance to have discrepancies (and after all
>> t2k.lib is not needed anymore :) ).
>>     
>>> But who knows?  Maybe we'll get lucky this time.  :-)
>>>       
>> I can hardly wait to get feedback on build status.
>> Hopefully this will be success report :)
>>     
>>>> BTW, for windows build you will need to build freetype.dll (i tried
>>>> only dll built with visualc). I believe that freetype build system
>>>> does not generate .dll on windows and therefore some manual tweaking
>>>> of freetype makefiles (and sources) might be necessary.
>>>>         
>>> Sounds like fun! :-)  Will the documentation include a patch?  Or just
>>> some tips on how to make a .DLL?  What source files needed to change?
>>>       
>> No, there is no patch or detailed instruction in the openjdk docs.
>>
>> You can follow "official" freetype approach -
>> http://freetype.freedesktop.org/wiki/FreeType_DLL.
>> I believe it worked for me to prepare 32 bit binary.
>> Perhaps someday they will finally simplify it and we can just run make :)
>>
>> In addition to described changes you may also want to tweak ftoptions.h
>> to enable subpixel rendering.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 8/2/2007
>> 2:22 PM
>>
>>     
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 8/2/2007
> 2:22 PM
>  
>
>   




More information about the discuss mailing list