Wiki & Bugzilla Updates

[Jiri Vanek]

On 02/01/2012 04:10 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 31/01/12 11:55 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>> On 01/31/2012 05:00 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
>>>> On 01/31/2012 08:09 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>>> With the release of 1.11, I've updated the wiki and Bugzilla
>>>>> accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is now possible to file bugs against 1.11 and target them for
>>>>> 1.11.1.
>>>>> I also added 8-hg which I noticed was missing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! I noticed this last night but I did not have the
>>>> permissions
>>>> to add these myself. I was going to ping you today about this :)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Omair
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think that also
>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/BuildRequirements
>>> should be upgraded.
>>>
>>> As dependence on Xerxes and Xalan is no longer valid, and was
>>> repalced
>>> by xsltproc (In Fedora hidden under libxslt).
>>>
>>> In rpm I have removed build requires xalan-j2 and xerces-j2 and
>>> added
>>> build requires libxslt, and build passed.
>>>
>>> Am I correct? In case that yes, then Danesh should do the change,
>>> as he
>>> s the guilty one for this change O:)
>>
>> Nope, Andrew Hughes was the one who wrote the original patch for
>> icedtea7 and backported to icedtea6.
>>
>
> Yes I did.  I'm not even going to attempt to update that patch though
> as it seems Fedora-specific and I only build on Fedora once in a blue moon.
> Seems like something packagers should be maintaining as they work with
> this on a daily basis (hint, hint)...
hmh.. I dont think it is fedora specific.
Xalan and xerces were repalced by xsltproc globaly, werent they?
>
>> (I've got backports of icedtea6's changeset in review for 6-1.10 and
>> 6-1.9 so that's probably where the confusion came in =)  )
>
> I thought we decided not to backport?  Any chance of a link to this?
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Danesh
>>
>