[RFC][icedtea-web]: PR1040: Signed jar(s) brought in through an extension jnlp are considered unsigned

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Tue Jun 12 09:48:43 PDT 2012


On 06/12/2012 06:16 PM, Saad Mohammad wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2012 11:54 AM, Saad Mohammad wrote:
>> Attached patch also includes reproducers.
>>
>
> Oops, sorry, I have forgotten to update the ChangeLog.
> I have attached the updated Changelog entry.
>
Reply just for reproducer - imho because classlaoders are sometimes very lazy, jou shoud try to 
access code in the extension jar and be sure that this jar is working .. Somehow - correctly (feel 
free to find inspiration in other multiple jars reproducers, but the machanism of ensuring 
extensions can be different)

Anyway, thanx for reproducer:)
J.



More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list