RFR: os_linux.cpp parse_os_info gives non descriptive output on current SLES releases
Baesken, Matthias
matthias.baesken at sap.com
Mon Apr 18 12:05:19 UTC 2016
Hello , the current implementation of the parse_os_info-function in os_linux.cpp gets the last line of a Linux-distro related file to
provide a meaningful OS version string.
However the information provided currently on SuSE Linux (SLES) is not very descriptive, it currently uses /etc/lsb-release and gives :
more /etc/lsb-release
LSB_VERSION="core-2.0-noarch:core-3.2-noarch:core-4.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.2-x86_64:core-4.0-x86_64"
So I suggest to use /etc/SuSE-release instead, which gives a good information for
SLES 9 - 12 in the ***first line*** of /etc/SuSE-release :
Example SLES11 :
more /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
VERSION = 11
PATCHLEVEL = 3
(this is similar to using /etc/redhat-release on Red Hat with the difference that the ***first line*** has the relevant info).
Additionally, /etc/os-release needs some special handling as well, because
the meaningful OS-release description string is not always the last line of the file but in the line
containing the information PRETTY_NAME=...
See also :
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/os-release.html
Example from Ubuntu 14 :
$ more /etc/os-release
...
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS"
...
It might also be a good idea to place /etc/os-release higher in the distro_files list, but I do not have access to
turbolinux / gentoo to check the situation on these distros.
Regards, Matthias
Diff :
--- a/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp Fri Apr 15 16:19:15 2016 +0100
+++ b/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp Mon Apr 18 13:54:04 2016 +0200
@@ -2013,8 +2013,8 @@
// their own specific XXX-release file as well as a redhat-release file.
// Because of this the XXX-release file needs to be searched for before the
// redhat-release file.
-// Since Red Hat has a lsb-release file that is not very descriptive the
-// search for redhat-release needs to be before lsb-release.
+// Since Red Hat and SuSE have an lsb-release file that is not very descriptive the
+// search for redhat-release / SuSE-release needs to be before lsb-release.
// Since the lsb-release file is the new standard it needs to be searched
// before the older style release files.
// Searching system-release (Red Hat) and os-release (other Linuxes) are a
@@ -2031,8 +2031,8 @@
"/etc/mandrake-release",
"/etc/sun-release",
"/etc/redhat-release",
+ "/etc/SuSE-release",
"/etc/lsb-release",
- "/etc/SuSE-release",
"/etc/turbolinux-release",
"/etc/gentoo-release",
"/etc/ltib-release",
@@ -2065,11 +2065,36 @@
static void parse_os_info(char* distro, size_t length, const char* file) {
FILE* fp = fopen(file, "r");
if (fp != NULL) {
+ // SuSE-release : first line is interesting
+ // os-release : PRETTY_NAME= line is interesting
+ // (might be at different locations in the file)
char buf[256];
- // get last line of the file.
- while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), fp)) { }
+ int lcnt = 0;
+ bool is_etc_suserelease = false;
+ bool is_etc_osrelease = false;
+ if (strcmp(file, "/etc/SuSE-release") == 0) {
+ is_etc_suserelease = true;
+ }
+ if (strcmp(file, "/etc/os-release") == 0) {
+ is_etc_osrelease = true;
+ }
+
+ // get last line of the file or
+ // other interesting line on SUSE / os-release
+ while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), fp)) {
+ if (lcnt == 0 && is_etc_suserelease) {
+ break;
+ }
+ if (is_etc_osrelease) {
+ if (strstr(buf, "PRETTY_NAME=") != NULL) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ lcnt++;
+ }
+
// Edit out extra stuff in expected ubuntu format
- if (strstr(buf, "DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=") != NULL) {
+ if (strstr(buf, "DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=") != NULL || strstr(buf, "PRETTY_NAME=") != NULL) {
char* ptr = strstr(buf, "\""); // the name is in quotes
if (ptr != NULL) {
ptr++; // go beyond first quote
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list