RFR: JDK-8160356: invalid suffix on literal warning is occurred with GCC 6

[Yasumasa Suenaga]

Hi Kim,

> However, I think this is an enhancement, as it wouldn’t be a problem if
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156980
> were fixed, so subject to a post-FC exemption or deferral to JDK 10.

I want to add FC extention label to this issue.
Can I add it now?


Thanks,

Yasumasa


On 2016/06/28 7:59, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga <yasuenag at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This review request relates to JDK-8160310: HotSpot cannot be built with GCC 6 .
>>
>> I encountered invalid suffix on literal when I compiled OpenJDK 9 with GCC 6
>> on Fedora 24 x64.
>> I think these error should be fixed.
>>
>> I uploaded webrev.
>> Could you review it?
>>
>>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8160356/webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> I'm jdk 9 committer, but I cannot access JPRT.
>> So I need a sponsor.
>
> This looks good.
>
> However, I think this is an enhancement, as it wouldn’t be a problem if
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156980
> were fixed, so subject to a post-FC exemption or deferral to JDK 10.
>