RFR: 8167446: Add back PermGenSize and MaxPermGenSize

[Lois Foltan]

+1.  Thanks for adding the test!
Lois

On 10/11/2016 6:10 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
> I think this looks great.  If we decide to never remove these options 
> at some point in the future, we can change the last element in the 
> array to undefined.
>
> Thanks for doing this so quickly, Max.
> Coleen
>
>
> On 10/11/16 5:29 PM, Max Ockner wrote:
>>
>> New webrev: http://oklahoma.us.oracle.com/~mockner/webrev/8167446.02
>>   - Added a test
>>   - Adjusted the obsolete field on both flags.
>>
>> On 10/11/2016 2:31 PM, harold seigel wrote:
>>> Hi Max,
>>>
>>> Can you add a small test?  It would prevent someone else from 
>>> removing the options.
>>>
>> I have added a simple test.
>>
>>> Thanks, Harold
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/11/2016 1:44 PM, Max Ockner wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> Please Review this small change.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mockner/8167446/
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167446
>>>>
>>>> Added PermSize and MaxPermSize to obsolete flags table. They are 
>>>> recognized but ignored.
>>>>
>>>> The bug title says "PermGenSize" and "MaxPermGenSize" but the 
>>>> comment says "PermSize" and MaxPermSize". Which one is correct?
>>>>
>>>> Tested both options on java -version. Nothing happens, but I don't 
>>>> get an "Unrecognized ..." error.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Max
>>>
>>
>