RFR (S): 8006088: Incompatible heap size flags accepted by VM

Tao Mao tao.mao at oracle.com
Mon Apr 29 23:40:14 UTC 2013


Wait...have we agreed that we should name gc jtreg tests more 
intuitively rather than putting Bug ID?
https://wikis.oracle.com/display/HotSpotInternals/Naming+HotSpot+JTReg+Tests

Thanks.
Tao

On 4/29/13 4:20 PM, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
> Looks good,
> Ship it!
> /Jesper
>
> Thomas Schatzl skrev 26/4/13 2:05 PM:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 10:57 -0700, John Cuthbertson wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Ship it.
>>>
>>> JohnC
>>
>>    I still need another reviewer to actually ship this :)
>>
>> It would also help to have this cleanup for CR-7057939 and CR-8012591.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Thomas
>>
>> On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 10:57 -0700, John Cuthbertson wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the resonse. Inline...
>>>
>>> On 4/17/2013 12:23 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>     I had the same concerns about inconsistencies with -Xms and
>>>> -XX:InitialHeapSize, but -Xms is (apparently) defined to set both
>>>> minimum and initial heap size.
>>>> I already raised that issue in an earlier discussion.
>>>
>>> OK. I don't have a problem with it. It just looked 'odd'.
>>>>
>>>> If you have an official source that states that -Xms only sets minimum
>>>> or initial heap size, I will gladly change this. I could not find
>>>> anything; actually the documentation (java -X) for -Xms states only 
>>>> that it sets the initial heap size.
>>>>
>>>> The observations below result from this definition.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 16:29 -0700, John Cuthbertson wrote:
>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do we treat:
>>>>>
>>>>> java -Xms8M  -XX:InitialHeapSize=4M...
>>>>>
>>>>> as an error while accepting:
>>>> Because -Xms sets minimum heap size to 8M, and if you then set initial
>>>> heap size to 4M there is a conflict in the general condition that
>>>> minimum <= initial <= max.
>>>>
>>>>> java -XX:InitialHeapSize=4M -Xms8M...
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks inconsistent. In both cases the user has asked for an 
>>>>> initial
>>>>> heap size less than his requested minimum.
>>>> As mentioned, -Xms unfortunately seems to be defined to set both 
>>>> initial
>>>> and minimum heap size. So there is no conflict.
>>>
>>> You're correct. I've looked at the contents of the Xusage.txt file 
>>> for a
>>> couple of really ancient jdks and it says that it sets the initial 
>>> size.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> In collectorPolicy.cpp, can the code on lines 79-80 and 83-84 be
>>>>> coalesced into a single line for each? This would make the setting of
>>>>> Initial and Min consistent with the code that sets Max on line 87.
>>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>> See http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8006088/webrev.7/ for the new
>>>> webrev.
>>>>
>>>> In addition to this change I fixed the headers of the jprt test 
>>>> cases to
>>>> avoid some issues with jtreg. Namely precompile the used classes and
>>>> install the whitebox api class into the boot class path.
>>>
>>> Thanks. collectorPolicy.cpp looks much cleaner.
>>>
>>> Ship it.
>>>
>>> JohnC
>>
>>



More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list