RFR (S): 8067868: Add GCOld as a JTreg test

[Dmitry Fazunenko]

On 19.12.2014 17:15, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> On 2014-12-19 14:36, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
>> Hi Bengt,
>>
>> I didn't try to understand the logic in detail, I think this is not 
>> new test.
>> What I noticed:
>> - the code doesn't meet java coding style (indent should be 4)
>> - checkTrees()method is declared, but all invocations are commented 
>> out. If we don't need the method we can remove it
>> - this test never fails (only if OOM or crash). Is it expected?
>
> Yes, just as you noted this is not a new test. I only moved it. I 
> would prefer to not move it and change it at the same time. This 
> review is just about moving the test into JTreg. Once it is there we 
> can start cleaning it up.

If you believe that this test checks something (or could be updated to 
check something) - the fix is fine by me.

Thanks,
Dima


>
> Thanks,
> Bengt
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dima
>>
>>
>> On 18.12.2014 15:45, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Could I have a couple of reviews for this change to make GCOld a 
>>> JTreg test?
>>>
>>> Root repo changes:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/8067868/root-webrev.00/
>>>
>>> HotSpot repo changes:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/8067868/hotspot-webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Bug report:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067868
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bengt
>>
>