RRF: JEP-271: Unified GC Logging

[Bengt Rutisson]

Hi David,

Thanks for looking at this again!

On 2015-11-25 13:29, David Lindholm wrote:
> Hi Bengt,
>
> My code review for the rest of the files:
>
> defNewGeneration.cpp:
>
> 517-520: Indentation

Fixed.

> 766: Shouldn't the tags be "gc, promotion"?

Yes. Fixed.

>
> collectorPolicy.cpp:
>
> 489: Shouldn't the tags be "gc, heap"?

Yes, fixed.

>
> genCollectedHeap.cpp:
>
> 1150+1152: Indentation
>
> generation.cpp:
>
> 162: Indentation

Fixed.

>
> plab.cpp:
>
> 153: Plab_size = " SIZE_FORMAT " desired_net_plab_sz = " SIZE_FORMAT 
> ": Why the capital P in this printout of one variable name but not the 
> other? I think it should be consistent.

Agreed. Fixed.


>
> referenceProcessor.cpp:
>
> 515: Indentation
>
> referenceProcessor.cpp:
>
> 948+953: Indentation
>
> metaspace.cpp:
>
> 1505: Indentation
> 1578+1580: Indentation
> 2695: Indentation
>
> runtimeService.cpp:
>
> 123-124: Indentation

Fixed.

Thanks,
Bengt

>
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 2015-11-23 18:25, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Here is an updated webrev based on the comments from the first 
>> review. The changes that have been discussed have only been to the 
>> hotspot repo:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.01/webrev.01/
>>
>> The changes to the JDK repo are the same as in the first webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.00/jdk-webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> Some partial diffs to make it easier for those who already looked at 
>> the first webrev.
>>
>> The unified logging framework was changed in the way it handles the 
>> develop logging. Here are the changes I had to do to accommodate the 
>> new develop logging:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.01/webrev.01-develop-logging 
>>
>>
>> Here are the changes I have made to address comments in the code 
>> (based on top of the develop logging changes):
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.01/webrev.00-01-code-diff 
>>
>>
>> And here are the changes that David has made to address comment in 
>> the tests:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.01/webrev.00-01-test-diff 
>>
>>
>> Enjoy!
>> Bengt
>>
>> On 2015-11-19 16:29, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> After three pre-reviews it is time for the fist official review 
>>> request for JEP-271 Unified GC Logging.
>>>
>>> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/271
>>>
>>> Most code changes are in the hotspot code:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.00/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Some tests in the JDK repo have been updated:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.00/jdk-webrev.00/
>>>
>>> As with the pre-reviews I have put togther some examples of what the 
>>> new logging looks like:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/JEP-271/review.00/compare.html
>>>
>>> The intent is that this should cover the bulk of the logging 
>>> changes. There will most definitely be some follow up changes where 
>>> we fix details in the log messages etc.
>>>
>>> Among many other old logging flags this changeset removes the two 
>>> flags PringGC and PrintGCDetails. These two will be added back with 
>>> a follow up changeset, but when they are added back they will be 
>>> marked as deprecated.
>>>
>>> The reason for first removing them and then adding them back is to 
>>> get testing without these flags. That way we will know that we clean 
>>> out all usages of these flags from our testing.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bengt
>>
>