[15] RFR 8245240: Shenandoah: support nesting evacuation OOM scope

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 5/19/20 9:38 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion regarding packed fields or separate
> fields. Bitfield access seems slightly awkward (I had to look it up to
> see what it actually is), otoh, space is limited in TL, so... ?

I would prefer separate fields to make the code clearer. Are we really down to squeezing in a new
byte in TL?

-- 
Thanks,
-Aleksey