RFR(s): 8076181: bytecodeInterpreter.cpp refers to unknown labels.

Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf at redhat.com
Mon Mar 30 11:02:10 UTC 2015


On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 11:58 -0400, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> Yes, this is good.  Sorry, I reviewed this and didn't think it would 
> break anything (obviously wrong).  I think this can be checked in 
> directly by a committer.

Thanks, Coleen.

I think a second review is still required.

Cheers,
Severin

> Thanks!
> Coleen
> 
> On 3/27/15, 11:49 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could somebody please review and sponsor this change?
> >
> > JDK-8074345 introduced new jumps to labels which were undefined in
> > bytecodeInterpreter.cpp. This makes release builds of Zero fail[1],
> > since it uses the computed goto approach rather than a switch statement
> > which debug builds use. AFAIK, Zero is the only remaining user of the C
> > ++ interpreter.
> >
> > The fix is to not introduce those unknown labels since they aren't
> > implemented anyway. Note: CDS is not implemented in Zero. I'm not
> > entirely sure why 8076181 touched bytecodeInterpreter.cpp in the first
> > place.
> >
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076181
> > webrev:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8076181/webrev.01/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
> >
> > [1]
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2015-March/014315.html
> >
> 





More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list