RFR(XXXS): 8163879 quarantine serviceability/sa/sadebugd/SADebugDTest.java since it hangs intermittently

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

Added back serviceability-dev at ... The "reply to list" option usually only
replies to one of the lists when more than one is specified... One of the
few cases where "reply to all" is useful... :-)

Thanks Harold!

Dan


On 8/11/16 12:59 PM, harold seigel wrote:
> Looks good!
>
> Harold
>
>
> On 8/11/2016 1:57 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm quarantining a test that hung in the 2016-08-09 and
>> 2016-08-10 JDK9-hs nightlies:
>>
>> JDK-8163879 quarantine serviceability/sa/sadebugd/SADebugDTest.java
>>             since it hangs intermittently
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163879
>>
>>
>> $ hg diff
>> diff -r 14f97d7574bf test/serviceability/sa/sadebugd/SADebugDTest.java
>> --- a/test/serviceability/sa/sadebugd/SADebugDTest.java Mon Aug 08 
>> 15:53:02 2016 +0000
>> +++ b/test/serviceability/sa/sadebugd/SADebugDTest.java Thu Aug 11 
>> 10:48:52 2016 -0700
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>   * @modules java.base/jdk.internal.misc
>>   * @library /test/lib/share/classes
>>   *
>> + * @ignore 8163805
>>   * @run main/othervm SADebugDTest
>>   */
>>  import java.io.File;
>>
>>
>> This change falls under the HotSpot Trivial Change rule so I'm
>> looking for a single (R)eviewer.
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, suggestions or questions!
>>
>> Dan
>