RFR(M): 8133749, 8133747, 8133740: NMT detail stack trace cleanup

[Chris Plummer]

Hi Dmitry,

On 8/18/16 9:25 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> PS: (hit send too early, sorry!)
>
> 3. nativeCallStack.cpp
>
> 43 #if (defined(_NMT_NOINLINE_) && defined(BSD) && defined(_LP64))
>
> Is it OS X specific behavior of clang specific one? Should we change
> define to __APPLE__ or __clang__, not BSD ?
I know for the compilers we use for officially released builds, the code 
works with my changes. If changes are needed for other compilers, then 
the code will need to be updated for them. As of now I don't know which 
compiler we use for Mac OS X, and which others, if any, are also 
supported. I just know when submitting builds with JPRT, the code is 
correct for Mac OS X.

Yes, these assumptions on what compilers are doing are ugly, but we 
already had these assumption before any of my changes. I've just fixed 
the assumptions that were incorrect, and added a test so we quickly find 
incorrect assumptions in the future.

thanks,

Chris
>
> -Dmitry
>
> On 2016-08-02 23:31, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please review the following:
>>
>> webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8133749-8133747-8133740/webrev-01/webrev.hotspot/
>>
>>
>> Bugs fixed:
>>
>> JDK-8133749: os::current_frame() is not returning the proper frame on
>> ARM and solaris-x64
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133749
>>
>> JDK-8133747: NMT includes an extra stack frame due to assumption NMT is
>> making on tail calls being used
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133747
>>
>> JDK-8133740: NMT for Linux/x86/x64 and bsd/x64 slowdebug builds includes
>> NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack() frame in backtrace
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133740
>>
>> The above bugs all result in the NMT detail stack traces including extra
>> frames in the stack traces. Certain frames are suppose to be skipped,
>> but sometimes are not. The frames that show up are:
>>
>>    NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack
>>    os::get_native_stack
>>
>> These are both methods used to generate the stack trace, and therefore
>> should not be included it.  However, under some (most) circumstances,
>> they were.
>>
>> Also, there was no test to make sure that any NMT detail output is
>> generated, or that it is correct. I've added one with this webrev. Of
>> the 27 possible builds (9 platforms * 3 build flavors), only 9 of the 27
>> initially passed this new test. They were the product and fastdebug
>> builds for solaris-sparc, bsd-x64, and linux-x64; and the slowdebug
>> builds for solaris-x64, windows-x86, and windows-x64. All the rest
>> failed. They now all pass with my fixes in place.
>>
>> Here's a summary of the changes:
>>
>> src/os/posix/vm/os_posix.cpp
>> src/os/windows/vm/os_windows.cpp
>>
>> JDK-8133747 fixes: There was some frame skipping logic here which was
>> sort of correct, but was misplace. There are no extra frames being added
>> in os::get_native_stack() due to lack of inlining or lack of a tail
>> call, so no need for toSkip++ here. The logic has been moved to
>> NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack, which is where the tail call is
>> (sometimes) made, and also corrected (see nativeCallStack.cpp below).
>>
>> src/share/vm/utilities/nativeCallStack.cpp
>>
>> JDK-8133747 fixes: The frame skipping logic that was moved here assumed
>> that NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack would not appear in the call stack
>> (due to a tail call be using to call os::get_native_stack) except in
>> slow debug builds. However, some platforms also don't use a tail call
>> even when optimized. From what I can tell that is the case for 32-bit
>> platforms and for windows.
>>
>> src/os_cpu/bsd_x86/vm/os_bsd_x86.cpp
>> src/os_cpu/windows_x86/vm/os_windows_x86.cpp
>> src/os_cpu/linux_x86/vm/os_linux_x86.cpp
>>
>> JDK-8133740 fixes: When _get_previous_fp is not inlined, we need to skip
>> one extra frame
>>
>> src/os_cpu/solaris_x86/vm/os_solaris_x86.cpp
>>
>> JDK-8133749 fixes: os:current_frame() was not consistent with other
>> platforms and needs to skip one more frame. This means it returns the
>> frame for the caller's caller. So when called by os:get_native_stack(),
>> it returns the frame for whoever called os::get_native_stack(). Although
>> not intuitive, this is what os:get_native_stack() expects. Probably a
>> method rename and/or a behavior change is justified here, but I would
>> prefer to do that with a followup CR if anyone has a good suggestion on
>> what to do.
>>
>> test/runtime/NMT/CheckForProperDetailStackTrace.java
>>
>> This is the new NTM detail test. It checks for frames that shouldn't be
>> present and validates at least one stack trace is what is expected.
>>
>> I verified that the above test now passes on all supported platforms,
>> and also did a full jprt "-testset hotpot" run. I plan on doing some RBT
>> testing with NMT detail enabled before committing.
>>
>> Regarding the community contributed ports that Oracle does not support,
>> I didn't make any changes there, but it looks like some of these bugs do
>> exist. Notably:
>>
>> -linux-aarch64: Looks like it suffers from JDK-8133740. The changes done
>> to the
>>   os_linux_x86.cp should also be applied here.
>> -linux-ppc: Hard to say for sure since the implementation of
>> os::current_frame is
>>   different than others, but it looks to me like it suffers from both
>> JDK-8133749
>>   and JDK-8133740.
>> -aix-ppc: Looks to be the same implementation as linux-ppc, so would
>> need the
>>   same changes.
>>
>> These ports may also be suffering from JDK-8133747, but that fix is in
>> shared code (nativeCallStack.cpp). My changes there will need some
>> tweaking for these ports they don't use a tail call to call
>> os::get_native_stack().
>>
>> If the maintainers of these ports could send me some NMT detail output,
>> I can advise better on what changes are needed. Then you can implement
>> and test them, and then send them back to me and I'll include them with
>> my changes. What I need is the following command run on product and
>> slowdebug builds. Initially run without any of my changes applied. If
>> needed I may followup with a request that they be run with the changes
>> applied:
>>
>> bin/java -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:NativeMemoryTracking=detail
>> -XX:+PrintNMTStatistics -version
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>