RFR 8176147: JVM should throw CFE for duplicate Signature attributes
harold seigel
harold.seigel at oracle.com
Wed Mar 8 14:00:43 UTC 2017
Hi David,
Thanks for the review!
I'll make the _generic_signature_index and test changes before pushing.
I added the signature_exists flag instead of checking if
_generic_signature_index == 0 because the setting of
_generic_signature_index is, in a sense, a side effect of calling
parse_classfile_signature_attribute(). But, its implementation is
unlikely to change.
Thanks, Harold
On 3/7/2017 9:23 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Sorry just noticed something minor ...
>
> For the class signature attribute you could just check if
> _generic_signature_index == 0 instead of adding the local
> signature_exists flag.
>
> David
>
> On 8/03/2017 12:13 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Harold,
>>
>> Changes look good.
>>
>> To avoid duplication in the tests I've been using this pattern for the
>> JDK 10 work I'm doing that's checking classfile format:
>>
>> public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
>> String[] badClasses = new String[] {
>> "class1",
>> "class2",
>> "class3",
>> };
>> String[] messages = new String[] {
>> "message1",
>> "message2",
>> "message3",
>> };
>>
>> for (int i = 0; i < badClasses.length; i++ ) {
>> try {
>> Class c = Class.forName(badClasses[i]);
>> throw new Error("Missing ClassFormatError: " +
>> messages[i]);
>> }
>> catch (ClassFormatError expected) {
>> if (!expected.getMessage().contains(messages[i]))
>> throw new Error("Wrong ClassFormatError message:
>> \"" +
>> expected.getMessage() + "\" does not
>> contain \"" +
>> messages[i] + "\"");
>> System.out.println("OK - got expected exception: " +
>> expected);
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>> On 7/03/2017 11:52 PM, harold seigel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review this JDK-9 fix to throw a ClassFormatError exception if
>>> the attributes table for a class, field, or method contains more than
>>> one Signature attribute.
>>>
>>> Open webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8176147/webrev/
>>>
>>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176147
>>>
>>> The fix was tested with the JCK lang and vm tests, the JTreg hotspot,
>>> java/io, java/lang, java/util and other tests, the RBT tier2 -tier5
>>> tests, the colocated and non-colocated NSK tests, and with JPRT.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Harold
>>>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list