Take 2: RFR: 8197429: Increased stack guard causes segfaults on x86-32

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Wed Feb 14 09:23:11 UTC 2018


On 13/02/18 23:44, Leonid Mesnik wrote:

> Thank you for fixing tests. I think that it would be also better to
> rewrite test in java using process utilities
> test/lib/jdk/test/lib/process/ProcessTools.java.
> It is possible to push shell test but the general direction for
> OpenJDK tests is to use java and testlibrary.
> Now it is more easier to develop and debug tests with new processes
> using testlibrary. Also the could be execute faster.
> But if you have any reasons to keep test in shell that I am fine.

I'm trying to test a very specific fault path, one that is due to the
JNI launcher from C.  IfI wanted to test something else I would do
something else, but I don't understand your motivation for wanting to
write the test in some other way.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list