8205054: Could not find "lsof" on test machine

Leo Korinth leo.korinth at oracle.com
Thu Jun 14 17:31:35 UTC 2018



On 14/06/18 19:10, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi Leo,
> 
> the fix looks good.  It makes sense to skip a test if the infrastructure is
> insufficient to run it.
> 
> Could you please put the long comment at the end of line 179
> into a line of it's own?

Fixed

> Also, please take the chance and move the Copyright message
> to the beginning of the file.

Fixed

> Best regards,
>    Goetz.
> 

Thanks for the fast review; I need a second reviewer and someone to help 
me push (I am not a commiter).

New webrevs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lkorinth/8205054/00_01/ (incremental)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lkorinth/8205054/01/    (full)

Thanks,
Leo

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hotspot-runtime-dev [mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev-
>> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Leo Korinth
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2018 18:55
>> To: Hotspot dev runtime <hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> Subject: RFR: 8205054: Could not find "lsof" on test machine
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Unfortunately some test machines does not have "lsof" installed, or it
>> can not be found.
>>
>> I do not know how to find "lsof" on the test machine where the test
>> fails; the command might not be installed. Here is a fix to make the
>> test case succeed if "lsof" can not be found. I believe it is the best
>> option (at least for now). I am sorry for all the noise I am generating.
>>
>> Bug:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205054
>>
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lkorinth/8205054/00/
>>
>> Testing:
>> I have tested this on my machine, and I have a mach5 test job running.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leo


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list