RFR 8235360: Update JDWP, JDI and Instrumentation specs for Record attribute

[Harold Seigel]

Hi Serguei,

 >> Is this new attribute for 14?

No.  15, maybe?

 >>Will it also come from Amber?

Yes.

Harold

On 12/6/2019 1:27 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Forgot to ask.
> Is this new attribute for 14?
> Will it also come from Amber?
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 12/6/19 10:21, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>> Hi Harold,
>>
>> Okay, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/19 05:16, Harold Seigel wrote:
>>> There will be another unmodifiable attribute with sealed types 
>>> called PermittedSubtypes.
>>>
>>> Harold
>>>
>>> On 12/5/2019 7:25 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. I was thinking about the same.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Serguei
>>>>
>>>> On 12/5/19 2:52 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>>> Looks good Harold!
>>>>>
>>>>> If we get any more of these unmodifiable attributes we may have to 
>>>>> look at a way to refer to them more abstractly and only define 
>>>>> them in one place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/12/2019 12:28 am, Harold Seigel wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review this trivial change to add documentation about the 
>>>>>> Record attribute to the JDWP, JDI, and Instrumentation specs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The changed .html pages (best viewed as 'raw') are included in 
>>>>>> the webrev but will not be pushed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open Webrev: 
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8235360/webrev/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235360
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fix was regression tested by running Mach5 tiers 1 and 2 
>>>>>> tests and builds on Linux-x64, Solaris, Windows, and Mac OS X.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Harold
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>