RFR 8235225: Replace CHECK_0 with CHECK_NULL for non-integer returning methods

[Harold Seigel]

Thanks Coleen!

Harold

On 2/26/2020 3:56 PM, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
> Looks good to me.
> Coleen
>
> On 2/26/20 8:52 AM, Harold Seigel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review this change to replace CHECK_0 with CHECK_NULL in 
>> functions that return oops or pointers and replace CHECK_0 with 
>> CHECK_false in functions that return bool.
>>
>> Open Webrev: 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8235225/webrev/index.html
>>
>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235225
>>
>> The fix was regression tested by running Mach5 tiers 1 and 2 tests 
>> and builds on Linux-x64, Solaris, Windows, and Mac OS X, by running 
>> Mach5 tiers 3-5 tests on Linux-x64, and JCK lang and VM tests on 
>> Linux-x64.
>>
>> Thanks, Harold
>>
>