RFR: 8247522: assert(is_aligned(class_space_rs.base(), class_space_alignment)) failed: Sanity

Ioi Lam ioi.lam at oracle.com
Mon Jun 15 05:53:57 UTC 2020


Looks good to me, too.

Thanks
- Ioi

On 6/14/20 4:42 PM, jiefu(傅杰) wrote:
> Thanks Thomas for your review.
>
> May I get a second review for this change?
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> From: Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 at 12:44 AM
> To: "jiefu(傅杰)" <jiefu at tencent.com>
> Cc: Hotspot dev runtime <hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8247522: assert(is_aligned(class_space_rs.base(), class_space_alignment)) failed: Sanity(Internet mail)
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing it!
>
> .. Thomas
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 17:14 jiefu(傅杰) <jiefu at tencent.com<mailto:jiefu at tencent.com>> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your review and nice comments.
>
> The bug was first found on Linux/x86 machines with our Tencent tlinux OS.
>
> Updated: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiefu/8247522/webrev.01/
>
> Your change is really cool.
> With your patch, I can even reproduce the bug on our macOS platforms.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> From: Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com<mailto:thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>>
> Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 at 8:41 PM
> To: "jiefu(傅杰)" <jiefu at tencent.com<mailto:jiefu at tencent.com>>
> Cc: "hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net>" <hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net>>
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8247522: assert(is_aligned(class_space_rs.base(), class_space_alignment)) failed: Sanity(Internet mail)
>
> Hi Jie,
>
> good catch! What platform did this occur on?
>
> Please remove the casts, you do not need them.
>
> Please add the following lines to your patch - these test modifications trigger the bug also on linux x64:
>
> ---------------
>
> diff -r 19b3969274ce test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/SharedBaseAddress.java
> --- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/SharedBaseAddress.java     Thu Jun 11 12:51:09 2020 +0200
> +++ b/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/SharedBaseAddress.java     Sat Jun 13 14:36:46 2020 +0200
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>           "1g", "8g", "64g","512g", "4t",
>           "32t", "128t", "0",
>           "1", "64k", "64M",
> +        "0x800001000",        // Default base address + 1 page - probably valid but unaligned to metaspace alignment, see JDK 8247522
>           "0xfffffffffff00000", // archive top wraps around 64-bit address space
>           "0xfff80000",         // archive top wraps around 32-bit address space
>           "0xffffffffffffffff", // archive bottom wraps around 64-bit address space -- due to align_up()
> diff -r 19b3969274ce test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/SharedBaseAddress.java
> --- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/SharedBaseAddress.java      Thu Jun 11 12:51:09 2020 +0200
> +++ b/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/SharedBaseAddress.java      Sat Jun 13 14:36:46 2020 +0200
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
>       private static final String[] testTable = {
>           "1g", "8g", "64g","512g", "4t",
>           "32t", "128t", "0",
> -        "1", "64k", "64M", "320g"
> +        "1", "64k", "64M", "320g",
> +        "0x800001000"  // Default base address + 1 page - probably valid but unaligned to metaspace alignment, see JDK 8247522
>       };
>
>       public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
>
> ---------------
>
> Thanks, Thomas
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:44 AM jiefu(傅杰) <jiefu at tencent.com<mailto:jiefu at tencent.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> JBS:    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8247522
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiefu/8247522/webrev.00/
>
> This bug was triggered after JDK-8245707.
> The reason is that ccs_begin_offset[1] is incorrect when archive_space_alignment != class_space_alignment.
>
> Before JDK-8245707, archive_space_alignment = class_space_alignment = 4k.
> After JDK-8245707,  archive_space_alignment = 4k, class_space_alignment = 16k.
>
> When the assert happened, we had observed base_address[2] = 4096, which is unaligned to class_space_alignment=16k.
>
> - Testing:
>           tier1 on Linux/x64
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk15/file/1c81917f228b/src/hotspot/share/memory/metaspaceShared.cpp#l2505
> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk15/file/1c81917f228b/src/hotspot/share/memory/metaspaceShared.cpp#l2514



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list