RFR: 8255741: Zero: print signal name in unhandled signal handler

Thomas Stüfe thomas.stuefe at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 12:28:17 UTC 2020


Sure, push away, I approved both fixes. #982 would be backportable too but
require much more work.

Thanks, Thomas

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 12:01 PM Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.java.net>
wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:56:13 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stuefe at openjdk.org> wrote:
>
> >> At least one test --
> `runtime/Safepoint/TestAbortVMOnSafepointTimeout.java` -- fails on Zero
> with:
> >>
> >> # Internal Error
> (/home/shade/trunks/jdk/src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_zero/os_linux_zero.cpp:250),
> pid=560280, tid=560281
> >> # fatal error: caught unhandled signal 4
> >>
> >> The test expects "SIGKILL (sent by kill)" in the test output.
> >>
> >> Additional testing:
> >>  - [x] `TestAbortVMOnSafepointTimeout.java` now passes on Linux x86_64
> Zero.
> >
> > LGTM
>
> Thanks! I was not aware of #982 -- that would be very good to have. Maybe
> push this simple patch to ease backporting? Making Zero pass tier1 in 11u
> would be nice. I suspect #982 would not be backportable?
>
> -------------
>
> PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1001
>


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list