Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8195685: AArch64: AArch64 cannot build with JDK-8174962

Fridrich Strba fridrich.strba at suse.com
Sat Jan 20 05:14:58 UTC 2018


Just a heads up that this particular commit broke even the Zero build. I have no right to comment in bugzilla, so stating it here.
F.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.-------- Original message --------From: "White, Derek" <Derek.White at cavium.com> Date: 20/01/2018  02:06  (GMT+01:00) To: mark.reinhold at oracle.com, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> Cc: jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com, jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net, aarch64-port-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8195685: AArch64: AArch64 cannot
 	build	with JDK-8174962 
Hi Mark,

Just a suggestion for future versions of the "Fix-Request Process":
 - I'd think that for port-specific patches (like this one), the Porting Lead should be consulted as the expert on this part of code base. 

Maybe Dalibor is the representative of all of the Porters, but you have this funny situation where Andrew has to ask Dalibor to review, who will likely defer back to Andrew.

Just a thought!

 -Derek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aarch64-port-dev [mailto:aarch64-port-dev-
> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of mark.reinhold at oracle.com
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:47 PM
> To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
> Cc: jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com; jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net; aarch64-
> port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8195685: AArch64: AArch64 cannot
> build with JDK-8174962
> 
> 2018/1/19 11:11:51 -0800, aph at redhat.com:
> > On 19/01/18 19:01, jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com wrote:
> >> In particular you need to add the label jdk10-fix-request to the JBS issue to
> alert the release team about this bug. If not they don't know that they have
> to wait for your fix to get done.
> >>
> >> Please don't just add the label though, there is more to it.
> >
> > OK.  Please help us get this done.  It's an essential fix to the
> > broken build caused by the fix for 8174962, so we don't have any
> > choice.
> 
> The fix-request process is defined here:
> 
>   http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/10/fix-request-process
> 
> - Mark



More information about the jdk-dev mailing list