Introducing time wasters
Michael Haupt
openjdk at haupz.de
Fri Sep 21 17:47:31 UTC 2018
Hi,
"nuisance", "embuggerance", "kerfuffle"?
Not entirely nonserious,
Michael
> Am 20.09.2018 um 20:31 schrieb Alejandro Revilla <apr at jpos.org>:
>
> Why not 'nasty'? It's a nasty bug, after all.
>
> My 2c.
>
> --
> @apr <http://twitter.com/apr>
>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> * Aleksey Shipilev:
>>
>>> dev-hard implies "this requires hard development"?
>>>
>>> Probably, the variant of "critical-for-dev-experience" to turn the
>>> whole thing positive.
>>
>> I think the point is the internal impact. Presumably it's like a test
>> blocker, except that it's possible to work around once understood (but
>> then the time waste has already occurred).
>>
>> I'm not sure if such bugs are automatically urgent. It's true that the
>> fix will quickly pay for itself, but that doesn't really tell us much
>> about priority and severity of the issue (and the difficulty of the fix
>> 8-).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Florian
>>
More information about the jdk-dev
mailing list